Comparison Overview

ITC Limited

VS

Dräger

ITC Limited

Virginia House, 37 J L Nehru Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN, 700071
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

ITC is one of India's foremost private sector companies with a Gross Revenue of ₹ 73,465 crores and EBITDA of ₹ 24,025 crores (as on 31.03.2025). ITC has a diversified presence in FMCG, Packaging, Paperboards & Specialty Papers and Agri-Business. ITC's aspiration to be an exemplar in sustainability practices is manifest in its status as the only company in the world, of its size and diversity, to be carbon, water and solid waste recycling positive. In addition, ITC's businesses and value chains create sustainable livelihoods for nearly 9 million people, a majority of whom represent the poorest in rural India.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 59,071
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Dräger

Moislinger Allee 53-55, Lübeck, 23552, DE
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

Dräger is an international leader in the fields of medical and safety technology. The family-owned company was founded in Lübeck, Germany, in 1889. The company’s long-term success is based on the four key strengths of its value-driven culture: customer intimacy, professional employees, continuous innovation and a commitment to outstanding quality. Dräger offers its customers anaesthesia workstations, medical ventilation, patient monitoring as well as neonatal care for premature babies and newborns. With ceiling supply units, IT solutions for the OR, and gas management systems the company is at the customer’s side throughout the entire hospital. Emergency response services, law and regulatory enforcement and the industry trust in Dräger’s integrated hazard management, in particular for personal protection and plant safety. This includes: respiratory protection equipment, stationary and portable gas detection systems, professional diving equipment and systems, as well as alcohol and drug impairment detection. In collaboration with its customers Dräger develops customized solutions, such as entire fire training systems, training concepts and workshops. Dräger has more than 13.700 employees worldwide and is currently present in more than 190 countries. The company has sales and service subsidiaries in over 40 countries. Its development and production facilities are based in Germany, Great Britain, Sweden, South Africa, the USA, Brazil, the Czech Republic and China. http://t4.life/dataprotection Drägerwerk AG & Co. KGaA Board of Managing Directors: Stefan Dräger (Chairman), Rainer Klug, Gert-Hartwig Lescow, Dr. Reiner Piske, Anton Schrofner Company registered at Lübeck Local Court Register of Companies Number: HRB 7903 HL Turnover tax identification number as per § 27a Turnover Tax Law: DE 135082211 General partner: Drägerwerk Verwaltungs AG Company registered at Lübeck Local Court Register of Companies Number: HRB 7395 HL

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,927
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-limited.jpeg
ITC Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/draeger.jpeg
Dräger
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ITC Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Dräger
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Limited in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dräger in 2026.

Incident History — ITC Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Dräger (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dräger cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-limited.jpeg
ITC Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/draeger.jpeg
Dräger
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ITC Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dräger company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Dräger company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ITC Limited company.

In the current year, Dräger company and ITC Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Dräger company nor ITC Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Dräger company nor ITC Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Dräger company nor ITC Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ITC Limited company nor Dräger company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ITC Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dräger company.

ITC Limited company employs more people globally than Dräger company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ITC Limited nor Dräger holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H