Comparison Overview

ISS Facility Services Norge

VS

Servest SA

ISS Facility Services Norge

Smeltedigelen, Kværnerbyen, Oslo, 0195, NO
Last Update: 2025-02-25 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

ISS startet som et vaktselskap i København i 1901 og er nå et av verdens ledende serviceselskaper. ISS har en halv million ansatte fordelt på 50 land og en omsetning på verdensbasis på 80 milliarder kroner. ISS skreddersyr serviceløsninger levert med konseptet "Det er alltid mennesker i det"​.

NAICS: 5612
NAICS Definition: Facilities Support Services
Employees: 548
Subsidiaries: 32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Servest SA

Waterfall Logistics Precinct Corner Bridal Veil Road and R101 Johannesburg, Gauteng 2090, ZA
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Excellent

Between 900 and 1000

Servest is a leading black-owned facilities management company, providing integrated facilities solutions for the internal and external built and marine environments; including solutions such as internal and external design and space planning, cost optimisation analysis, carbon impact reduction, cleaning, parking, catering, hygiene, security, pest control, office plants, and landscaping solutions across multiple African countries. Servest was established in 1997. In 2015, Kagiso Tiso Holdings (KTH) acquired 51% of Servest making it the first black-owned facilities management company in Africa. The Group employs 24 000 people across 11 110 sites. Servest is the go-to integrated facilities solutions provider for the continent’s diverse businesses, for the internal and external built and marine environments. Integrated Facilities Solutions? Think Servest

NAICS: 561
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iss-norway-a-s.jpeg
ISS Facility Services Norge
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servest-sa.jpeg
Servest SA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ISS Facility Services Norge
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Servest SA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ISS Facility Services Norge in 2025.

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Servest SA in 2025.

Incident History — ISS Facility Services Norge (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ISS Facility Services Norge cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Servest SA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Servest SA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/iss-norway-a-s.jpeg
ISS Facility Services Norge
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/servest-sa.jpeg
Servest SA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both ISS Facility Services Norge company and Servest SA company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Servest SA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ISS Facility Services Norge company.

In the current year, Servest SA company and ISS Facility Services Norge company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Servest SA company nor ISS Facility Services Norge company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Servest SA company nor ISS Facility Services Norge company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Servest SA company nor ISS Facility Services Norge company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ISS Facility Services Norge company nor Servest SA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

ISS Facility Services Norge company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Servest SA company.

ISS Facility Services Norge company employs more people globally than Servest SA company, reflecting its scale as a Facilities Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim’s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N