Comparison Overview

Isleta Resort & Casino

VS

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort

Isleta Resort & Casino

11000 BROADWAY BLVD SE, Albuquerque, New Mexico, 87105, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

More than a world-class travel destination, Isleta Resort & Casino is a lush oasis, high in the desert, above the crowd and beyond compare. Steeped with native tradition and elegance, we invite you to feel the rhythm, absorb the energy and discover the essence of what a good time really is. Spread Your Wings. Rise Above the Rest.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 315
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort

3438 Stoluckquamish Ln., Arlington, Washington, 98223, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Open since 2004, the business is home to 1,400 slot machines, a Sports Book, a wide variety of table games, two virtual sports gaming suites, and a bowling alley. The gaming and entertainment destination is complimented by a three-star hotel with 125 rooms, conference area, and a ballroom, as well as an assortment of dining options including both a high-end steakhouse and an award-winning microbrewery. Angel of the Winds Casino Resort is privately owned by the Stillaguamish Tribe of Indians with over 700 of employees from the Northwest, Olympic, and South Puget Sound regions.

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 341
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isleta-resort-&-casino.jpeg
Isleta Resort & Casino
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-of-the-winds-casino.jpeg
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Isleta Resort & Casino
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Isleta Resort & Casino in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort in 2025.

Incident History — Isleta Resort & Casino (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Isleta Resort & Casino cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isleta-resort-&-casino.jpeg
Isleta Resort & Casino
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/angel-of-the-winds-casino.jpeg
Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Isleta Resort & Casino company and Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Isleta Resort & Casino company.

In the current year, Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company and Isleta Resort & Casino company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company nor Isleta Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company nor Isleta Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company nor Isleta Resort & Casino company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino company nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino company nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort company employs more people globally than Isleta Resort & Casino company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Isleta Resort & Casino nor Angel Of The Winds Casino Resort holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H