Comparison Overview

Island Photography

VS

Exum Photography

Island Photography

139 Haven Ave, Port Washington, 11050, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Island Photography was founded in 1986 by Alex and Cheryl Ipiotis. Specializing primarily in Races and Graduations, our vision was to provide every participant with great looking complimentary photo proofs of their special moments. Our delivery would be quick and our prices would be within reach to all. We are poised, focused and passionate about our business. Our mission is building good business relationships and providing excellent customer service. We believe in going beyond the call of duty when covering an event. We are team players that bring more than just photo coverage to events!

NAICS: 54192
NAICS Definition: Photographic Services
Employees: 105
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Exum Photography

115 Avenue of Trees, Elon, North Carolina, 27244, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Exum Photography is a North Carolina based studio of photographers shooting for a mix of commercial and editorial clients. We produce both still and motion imagery. Under principal photographer Steve Exum is associate photographer Griffin Davis and associate graphic designer Kelsey Morgan. We collaborate with filmmaker Peyton Lea, of Peyton Lea Productions, to fulfill video needs for our clients. Exum and his associates work from a studio in Elon, NC near Greensboro. Our projects are shot all over North Carolina and beyond. Our photographers specialize in conceptual portraiture, fashion, architecture, home furnishings, product, industry, and photojournalistic wedding coverage.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/island-photography.jpeg
Island Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exum-photography.jpeg
Exum Photography
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Island Photography
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Exum Photography
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Island Photography in 2025.

Incidents vs Photography Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exum Photography in 2025.

Incident History — Island Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Island Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Exum Photography (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exum Photography cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/island-photography.jpeg
Island Photography
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exum-photography.jpeg
Exum Photography
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Island Photography company and Exum Photography company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Exum Photography company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Island Photography company.

In the current year, Exum Photography company and Island Photography company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Island Photography company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Island Photography company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Exum Photography company nor Island Photography company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Island Photography company nor Exum Photography company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Island Photography company nor Exum Photography company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Island Photography company employs more people globally than Exum Photography company, reflecting its scale as a Photography.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Island Photography nor Exum Photography holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N