Comparison Overview

Türkiye İş Bankası

VS

National Bank of Canada

Türkiye İş Bankası

Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

In the nearly 100 years since its founding by the Great Leader Mustafa Kemal Atatürk on August 26, 1924, İşbank has undertaken various roles and made significant contributions to the development of our country in many fields, especially in industry and trade. İşbank offers products and services to its customers in corporate, commercial, SME, retail and private banking areas with its around 22 thousand employees, nearly 1,200 domestic branches and approximately 6,400 ATMs by the end of 2021, together with its advanced digital banking channels. İşbank also operates abroad with its branches abroad located in the Turkish Republic of Northern Cyprus, England, Kosovo, Iraq and Bahrain; 100% owned subsidiaries in Germany, Russia and Georgia; and with its representative offices in China and Egypt. The Bank is the largest private bank in Turkey in terms of total assets, loans, deposits and shareholders’equity; number of branches and ATMs. The largest share of the Bank's capital is held by the İşbank Pension Fund, which was founded by its employees. İşbank, an organization synonymous with trust, consistency and dignity, works for an inclusive and environment-friendly economy with its sense of responsibility stemming from its history. For further deteails, you can visit https://www.isbank.com.tr/en/about-us page.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

National Bank of Canada

800 Rue Saint-Jacques, Montreal, Quebec, H3C 1A3, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-17
Between 750 and 799

At National Bank, we believe in the potential of each individual, and that even the smallest gestures can make a big difference. When we help others accomplish their projects, we help empower them and the community at large. We try to make a difference through innovation, but above all, by putting people first. By taking the time to listen and letting our actions speak for themselves. By remaining bold and passionate. By developing lasting relationships as partners and allies. Together we can achieve great things and create a positive impact. Want to learn more about us? For advice on your personal finances, visit: nbc.ca/advice For advice on your business, visit: nbc.ca/business For career opportunities, visit: jobs.nbc.ca For all the latest news, visit: nbc.ca/news By clicking "Follow" above, you may receive communications from National Bank, either in your LinkedIn inbox or by other means via LinkedIn, about products and services that could interest you. Learn more at: www.nbc.ca/socialnetworks.

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 19,281
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isbankasi.jpeg
Türkiye İş Bankası
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-canada.jpeg
National Bank of Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Türkiye İş Bankası
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
National Bank of Canada
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Türkiye İş Bankası in 2026.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for National Bank of Canada in 2026.

Incident History — Türkiye İş Bankası (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Türkiye İş Bankası cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — National Bank of Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

National Bank of Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/isbankasi.jpeg
Türkiye İş Bankası
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/national-bank-of-canada.jpeg
National Bank of Canada
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

National Bank of Canada company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Türkiye İş Bankası company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, National Bank of Canada company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Türkiye İş Bankası company.

In the current year, National Bank of Canada company and Türkiye İş Bankası company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither National Bank of Canada company nor Türkiye İş Bankası company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither National Bank of Canada company nor Türkiye İş Bankası company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither National Bank of Canada company nor Türkiye İş Bankası company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası company nor National Bank of Canada company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

National Bank of Canada company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Türkiye İş Bankası company.

National Bank of Canada company employs more people globally than Türkiye İş Bankası company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Türkiye İş Bankası nor National Bank of Canada holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N