Comparison Overview

The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust

VS

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art

The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust

undefined, undefined, undefined, TF8 7DQ, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust is a heritage conservation and education charity. We are home to 36 listed buildings across 10 sites which include some of the most important industrial heritage in the world. As well as hosting visitors and events we deliver award winning workshops. The 10 Ironbridge Gorge Museums are all set in historic buildings comprising of Blists Hill Victorian Town, Coalbrookdale Museum of Iron, Darby Houses, Enginuity, Coalport China Museum, Jackfield Tile Museum, Museum of the Gorge, Broseley Pipeworks, Tar Tunnel and the Iron Bridge and Tollhouse. Our visitors experience authentic Victorian life at Blists Hill Victorian Town, the stunning open air museum that tells the story of the people of Shropshire during the Industrial Revolution. Visit Coalbrookdale to discover the often hidden history behind Victorian invention and the role critical role Coalbrookdale iron played in changing the course of the world. At Jackfield Tile Museum and Coalport China Museum visitors discover the creativity of the Ironbridge Gorge throughout history. Following 50 years of intense redevelopment, consolidation and restoration the Trust’s portfolio of heritage assets has grown substantially and in 2017 we celebrated the 50th anniversary of the Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust. Today we still have the same commitment to preserving the industrial history of this region and as a charity we have a number of ways you can support us including our Fund for the Future.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art

Gateshead Quays, South Shore Road, Gateshead, GB, NE8 3BA
Last Update: 2026-01-13
Between 750 and 799

BALTIC is a major international centre for contemporary art, housed in a landmark industrial building on the south bank of the River Tyne in Gateshead, BALTIC does not have a permanent collection, providing instead an ever-changing calendar of exhibitions and events that give a unique and compelling insight into contemporary artistic practice. BALTIC’s dynamic, diverse and international programme ranges from blockbuster exhibitions to innovative new work and projects created by artists working within the local community. BALTIC is a place where visitors can experience innovative and provocative new art, relax, have fun, learn and discover fresh ideas. BALTIC is an international leader in the ambitious and distinctive presentation, commissioning, development and communication of contemporary visual art. BALTIC is a registered charity, support by the Arts Council, grants from trusts and foundations, corporate sponsorship and trading activities in the restaurant,cafe and the BALTIC Shop. http://shop.balticmil.com

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 91
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ironbridge-gorge-museum-trust-limited.jpeg
The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltic-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art in 2026.

Incident History — The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ironbridge-gorge-museum-trust-limited.jpeg
The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/baltic-centre-for-contemporary-art.jpeg
Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company and Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company.

In the current year, Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company and The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company nor The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust company and Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The Ironbridge Gorge Museum Trust nor Baltic Centre for Contemporary Art holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N