Comparison Overview

Ira Ginzburg LTD

VS

AMLES design

Ira Ginzburg LTD

None
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

Ira Ginzburg and her team aim to project a clear, creative and compelling message for their clients across a saturated and noisy world. The team works with clients through all the stages of the branding definition process to gain a comprehensive understanding of the company and its needs. We ask the questions to uncover the company’s core values and business strategy demands. We then conduct research and analysis and this in turn forms the basis of our creative strategy. Clients are full partners in the process. We assist clients translate their brand into simple and appealing messages - that do the work. We pride ourselves on a truly innovative approach to creative strategy - that achieves definite and measurable business results. Ira Ginzburg is one of the leading branding and creative management companies in Israel today. The company's clients include leading finance and tech corporations in Israel and in Europe, as well public organizations, governmental institutions, associations, and cultural organizations.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 7
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

AMLES design

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

AMLES design is een jong getalenteerd grafisch ontwerpbureau dat beschikt over specialisatie op het gebied van creatieve en heldere communicatie. AMLES design streeft ernaar om uw bedrijf en uw producten onderscheidend in de markt te zetten. Of het nu gaat om huisstijllen, brochures, verpakkingen, totaalconcepten voor nieuwe producten, of het opzetten en onderhouden van websites bij AMLES design bent u aan het goede adres.

NAICS: 54143
NAICS Definition: Graphic Design Services
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ira-ginzburg-ltd.jpeg
Ira Ginzburg LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amles-design.jpeg
AMLES design
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Ira Ginzburg LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
AMLES design
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ira Ginzburg LTD in 2025.

Incidents vs Graphic Design Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for AMLES design in 2025.

Incident History — Ira Ginzburg LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ira Ginzburg LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — AMLES design (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AMLES design cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ira-ginzburg-ltd.jpeg
Ira Ginzburg LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amles-design.jpeg
AMLES design
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Ira Ginzburg LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to AMLES design company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, AMLES design company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Ira Ginzburg LTD company.

In the current year, AMLES design company and Ira Ginzburg LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither AMLES design company nor Ira Ginzburg LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither AMLES design company nor Ira Ginzburg LTD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither AMLES design company nor Ira Ginzburg LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD company nor AMLES design company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD company nor AMLES design company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ira Ginzburg LTD company employs more people globally than AMLES design company, reflecting its scale as a Graphic Design.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Ira Ginzburg LTD nor AMLES design holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X