Comparison Overview

IPVanish VPN

VS

Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF

IPVanish VPN

114 5th Ave, New York, New York, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-03-06 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

IPVanish is the only true Top Tier VPN service in the world. This means we deliver the best VPN speeds, the most secure connections and the most competitive pricing anywhere. Our VPN service spans 40,000+ IPs on 2400+ servers in more than countries, giving you the ability to surf anonymously and access blocked websites from every corner of the globe. IPVanish simply believes in a secure Internet — an online environment with the freedom to protect confidential data and maintain anonymity. As a champion for privacy, IPVanish offers a secure solution to protect online activity and personal information. Everyone deserves online confidentiality, and IPVanish is there to provide the lock and key.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 12
Subsidiaries: 44
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF

3855 SW 153rd Dr Beaverton, OR 97003, US
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

The Open Connectivity Foundation (OCF) is a global, member-driven technical standards development organization. Its 500+ members are working to enable trust, interoperability, and secure communication between IP-connected IoT devices and services. It does this by fostering collaboration between stakeholders across the IoT ecosystem to deliver the freely-available ISO/IEC specifications, including the Secure IP Device Framework, its open-source reference implementation, and an industry-recognized certification program. This enables innovative new secure use cases and user experiences, reduces development costs, integration complexity and time to market, and simplifies regulatory compliance to IoT security and privacy baselines. OCF members work across the enterprise layers of infrastructure, applications, and data. They collaborate to co-create and deploy systems in an open and standardized way, enabling devices to communicate over IP, regardless of form factor, operating system, service provider, transport technology, or ecosystem. The vertical-agnostic technology has already seen significant adoption in the smart home sector and is now enabling the transition to secure, intelligent, Building Automation Systems (BAS) based on IP connectivity networks.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipvanish.jpeg
IPVanish VPN
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-connectivity-foundation.jpeg
Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
IPVanish VPN
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPVanish VPN in 2025.

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF in 2025.

Incident History — IPVanish VPN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPVanish VPN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Open Connectivity Foundation ‚Äì OCF (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipvanish.jpeg
IPVanish VPN
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/open-connectivity-foundation.jpeg
Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both IPVanish VPN company and Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IPVanish VPN company.

In the current year, Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company and IPVanish VPN company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company nor IPVanish VPN company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company nor IPVanish VPN company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company nor IPVanish VPN company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IPVanish VPN company nor Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

IPVanish VPN company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company.

IPVanish VPN company employs more people globally than Open Connectivity Foundation – OCF company, reflecting its scale as a Technology, Information and Internet.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MinIO is a high-performance object storage system. In all versions prior to RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z, a privilege escalation vulnerability allows service accounts and STS (Security Token Service) accounts with restricted session policies to bypass their inline policy restrictions when performing operations on their own account, specifically when creating new service accounts for the same user. The vulnerability exists in the IAM policy validation logic where the code incorrectly relied on the DenyOnly argument when validating session policies for restricted accounts. When a session policy is present, the system should validate that the action is allowed by the session policy, not just that it is not denied. An attacker with valid credentials for a restricted service or STS account can create a new service account for itself without policy restrictions, resulting in a new service account with full parent privileges instead of being restricted by the inline policy. This allows the attacker to access buckets and objects beyond their intended restrictions and modify, delete, or create objects outside their authorized scope. The vulnerability is fixed in version RELEASE.2025-10-15T17-29-55Z.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Envoy is an open source edge and service proxy. Envoy versions earlier than 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, and 1.33.12 contain a use-after-free vulnerability in the Lua filter. When a Lua script executing in the response phase rewrites a response body so that its size exceeds the configured per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (default 1MB), Envoy generates a local reply whose headers override the original response headers, leaving dangling references and causing a crash. This results in denial of service. Updating to versions 1.36.2, 1.35.6, 1.34.10, or 1.33.12 fixes the issue. Increasing per_connection_buffer_limit_bytes (and for HTTP/2 the initial_stream_window_size) or increasing per_request_buffer_limit_bytes / request_body_buffer_limit can reduce the likelihood of triggering the condition but does not correct the underlying memory safety flaw.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

In Xpdf 4.05 (and earlier), a PDF object loop in a CMap, via the "UseCMap" entry, leads to infinite recursion and a stack overflow.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in NucleoidAI Nucleoid up to 0.7.10. The impacted element is the function extension.apply of the file /src/cluster.ts of the component Outbound Request Handler. Such manipulation of the argument https/ip/port/path/headers leads to server-side request forgery. The attack may be performed from remote.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

HCL Traveler for Microsoft Outlook (HTMO) is susceptible to a credential leakage which could allow an attacker to access other computers or applications.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N