Comparison Overview

ipushpull

VS

VINCI Energies

ipushpull

43-45 Dorset Street, London, GB, W1U 7NA
Last Update: 2026-02-20
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ipushpull.com

ipushpull is a leading capital market FinTech, specialising in real-time data sharing and workflow automation. Used across sell-side, buy-side, and front-to-back office. We give data-driven organisations the ability to transform how they deliver for their customers, by providing the right data, at the right time, in the right place. Data drives financial markets however data sharing has hardly changed for decades. Our goal is to help data-driven businesses unlock their full potential; powering data workflows that free people to choose how and where they want to work.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR
Last Update: 2026-03-31
Between 750 and 799
http://www.vinci-energies.com

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implementation, operation and maintenance. With their strong local roots and agile and innovative structure, VINCI Energies’ 2,100 business units have positioned themselves at the heart of the energy choices of their customers, boosting the reliability, efficiency and sustainability of their infrastructure and processes. VINCI Energies strives for global performance, caring for the planet, useful to people and committed to local communities. 2024: €20.4 billion // 102,600 employees // 2,100 Business Units // 61 countries

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 24,873
Subsidiaries: 109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipushpull.jpeg
ipushpull
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ipushpull
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VINCI Energies
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ipushpull in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.

Incident History — ipushpull (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ipushpull cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipushpull.jpeg
ipushpull
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vinci-energies.jpeg
VINCI Energies
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: phishing, exploiting vulnerabilities, supply chain compromises, third-party breaches, cookie hijacking
Motivation: financial gain, operational disruption, geopolitical influence, strategic hybrid warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

VINCI Energies company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to ipushpull company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

VINCI Energies company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ipushpull company has not reported any.

In the current year, VINCI Energies company and ipushpull company have not reported any cyber incidents.

VINCI Energies company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ipushpull company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies company nor ipushpull company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VINCI Energies company nor ipushpull company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ipushpull company nor VINCI Energies company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

VINCI Energies company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ipushpull company.

VINCI Energies company employs more people globally than ipushpull company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ipushpull nor VINCI Energies holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References