Comparison Overview

IPPR

VS

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.

IPPR

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749

IPPR is an independent charity working towards a fairer, greener, and more prosperous society. We are researchers, communicators, and policy experts creating tangible progressive change, and turning bold ideas into common sense realities. Working across the UK, IPPR, IPPR North, and IPPR Scotland are deeply connected to the people of our nations and regions, and the issues our communities face. We have helped shape national conversations and progressive policy change for more than 30 years. Through rigorous research, analysis and public dialogue, we improve understanding of the issues and make impactful solutions workable. Our work builds on analysis and recommendations to shift the policy debate and create a new consensus.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 143
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.

7704 Georgetown Pike, McLean, VA 22102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. is a boutique regulatory affairs advisory firm. We help cutting-edge biopharma, medical device, and combination product clients distill complex health care issues into meaningful commercial and philanthropic opportunities. We advise a wider range of clients, like trade organizations, patient advocacy groups and academic institutions, who have specific issues before the FDA, as well as those focused on building longer-term win-win relationships. Our expertise includes understanding the regulatory and policy environment, identifying novel regulatory pathways for cutting edge health care technologies, regulatory intelligence gathering designed to inform corporate strategy, and helping clients understand the current FDA. Follow us on Twitter: @Catalyst_HC_C

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 8
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ippr.jpeg
IPPR
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-healthcare-consulting-inc-.jpeg
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IPPR
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPPR in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. in 2025.

Incident History — IPPR (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPPR cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ippr.jpeg
IPPR
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/catalyst-healthcare-consulting-inc-.jpeg
Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

IPPR company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IPPR company.

In the current year, Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company and IPPR company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor IPPR company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor IPPR company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company nor IPPR company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IPPR company nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IPPR company nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IPPR company employs more people globally than Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IPPR nor Catalyst Healthcare Consulting, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H