Comparison Overview

IPG Mediabrands

VS

VML

IPG Mediabrands

Last Update: 2025-12-10

IPG Mediabrands is the media and marketing solutions division of Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands manages over $47 billion in marketing investment globally on behalf of its clients across its full-service agency networks UM, Initiative and Mediahub and through its award-winning specialized business units Healix, KINESSO, MAGNA, Mediabrands Content Studio, Orion Holdings, Rapport, and the IPG Media Lab. IPG Mediabrands clients include many of the world’s most recognizable and iconic brands from a broad portfolio of industry sectors including automotive, personal finance, consumer product goods (CPG), pharma, health and wellness, entertainment, financial services, energy, toys and gaming, direct to consumer and e-commerce, retail, hospitality, food and beverage, fashion and beauty. The company employs more than 18,000 diverse marketing communication professionals in more than 130 countries. Learn more at www.ipgmediabrands.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,224
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

VML

3 WTC 175 Greenwich Street, New York, New York, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

VML is a global powerhouse born from the unification of Wunderman Thompson and VMLY&R — two of the world's most powerful and accomplished creative agencies with complementary capabilities and geographic strengths. We have an industry-unique opportunity to provide our client partners with a fully integrated offering across brand experience, customer experience and commerce practices — powered by deep data and technology experience. For more information, visit www.vml.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 29,881
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmlyr.jpeg
VML
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IPG Mediabrands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
VML
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPG Mediabrands in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VML in 2025.

Incident History — IPG Mediabrands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPG Mediabrands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — VML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/vmlyr.jpeg
VML
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

VML company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IPG Mediabrands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, VML company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IPG Mediabrands company.

In the current year, VML company and IPG Mediabrands company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither VML company nor IPG Mediabrands company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither VML company nor IPG Mediabrands company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither VML company nor IPG Mediabrands company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands company nor VML company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IPG Mediabrands company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to VML company.

VML company employs more people globally than IPG Mediabrands company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor VML holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N