Comparison Overview

IPG Mediabrands

VS

dentsu

IPG Mediabrands

Last Update: 2025-12-10
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ipgmediabrands.com/

IPG Mediabrands is the media and marketing solutions division of Interpublic Group (NYSE: IPG). IPG Mediabrands manages over $47 billion in marketing investment globally on behalf of its clients across its full-service agency networks UM, Initiative and Mediahub and through its award-winning specialized business units Healix, KINESSO, MAGNA, Mediabrands Content Studio, Orion Holdings, Rapport, and the IPG Media Lab. IPG Mediabrands clients include many of the world’s most recognizable and iconic brands from a broad portfolio of industry sectors including automotive, personal finance, consumer product goods (CPG), pharma, health and wellness, entertainment, financial services, energy, toys and gaming, direct to consumer and e-commerce, retail, hospitality, food and beverage, fashion and beauty. The company employs more than 18,000 diverse marketing communication professionals in more than 130 countries. Learn more at www.ipgmediabrands.com.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 11,224
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

dentsu

1-8-1 Higashi-shimbashi, Tokyo, undefined, undefined, JP
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
https://bit.ly/3lDa6Ff

We are dentsu. We team together to help brands predict and plan for disruptive future opportunities and create new paths to growth in the sustainable economy. We know people better than anyone else and we use those insights to connect brand, content, commerce and experience, underpinned by modern creativity. We are the network designed for what’s next.

NAICS: 541613
NAICS Definition: Marketing Consulting Services
Employees: 17,322
Subsidiaries: 50
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IPG Mediabrands
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
dentsu
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IPG Mediabrands in 2025.

Incidents vs Advertising Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for dentsu in 2025.

Incident History — IPG Mediabrands (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IPG Mediabrands cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — dentsu (X = Date, Y = Severity)

dentsu cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ipgmediabrands.jpeg
IPG Mediabrands
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dentsu-aegis-network.jpeg
dentsu
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

FAQ

dentsu company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IPG Mediabrands company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

dentsu company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas IPG Mediabrands company has not reported any.

In the current year, dentsu company has reported more cyber incidents than IPG Mediabrands company.

Neither dentsu company nor IPG Mediabrands company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

dentsu company has disclosed at least one data breach, while IPG Mediabrands company has not reported such incidents publicly.

dentsu company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while IPG Mediabrands company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands company nor dentsu company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

dentsu company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to IPG Mediabrands company.

dentsu company employs more people globally than IPG Mediabrands company, reflecting its scale as a Advertising Services.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IPG Mediabrands nor dentsu holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References