Comparison Overview

ioneteam

VS

Inetum

ioneteam

Calle de Antonio López, 249 Cuarta Planta, Puerta A Bis Madrid, Community of Madrid 28041, ES
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000

Excellent

Ayudamos a departamentos de informática a optimizar sus procesos, definiendo e implantando aquellas tecnologías que permitan automatizar procesos rutinarios de gestión, aportar alta capacidad técnica gracias a herramientas específicas y, reducir costes. En iONE estamos comprometidos con la calidad y el buen servicio. Sabemos que la satisfacción del cliente es lo primero, por ello partimos de un modelo de servicios adaptados a las necesidades del cliente con el objetivo de asegurar resultados inmejorables en las implantaciones de productos TI, así como prestar servicios profesionales y asistencias técnicas con equipo altamente cualificado. La excelencia de nuestro servicio está en la alta eficacia del sistema productivo y su flexibilidad, permitiendo ser extremadamente ágiles cubriendo las necesidades de cada cliente.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Inetum

Last Update: 2024-06-30 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Inetum is a European leader in digital services. Inetum’s team of 28,000 consultants and specialists strive every day to make a digital impact for businesses, public sector entities and society. Inetum’s solutions aim at contributing to its clients’ performance and innovation as well as the common good. Present in 19 countries with a dense network of sites, Inetum partners with major software publishers to meet the challenges of digital transformation with proximity and flexibility. Driven by its ambition for growth and scale, Inetum generated sales of 2.5 billion euros in 2023. 🏅 Top Employer Europe 2024

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 19,805
Subsidiaries: 12
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ione-team.jpeg
ioneteam
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ioneteam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Inetum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ioneteam in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Inetum in 2025.

Incident History — ioneteam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ioneteam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Inetum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Inetum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ione-team.jpeg
ioneteam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/inetum.jpeg
Inetum
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2021
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ioneteam company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Inetum company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Inetum company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ioneteam company has not reported any.

In the current year, Inetum company and ioneteam company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Inetum company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while ioneteam company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Inetum company nor ioneteam company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Inetum company nor ioneteam company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ioneteam company nor Inetum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Inetum company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ioneteam company.

Inetum company employs more people globally than ioneteam company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

An issue was discovered in chinabugotech hutool before 5.8.4 allowing attackers to execute arbitrary expressions that lead to arbitrary method invocation and potentially remote code execution (RCE) via the QLExpressEngine class.

Description

A weakness has been identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /sys/role/exportXls. This manipulation causes improper authorization. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A security flaw has been discovered in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /sys/user/exportXls of the component Filter Handler. The manipulation results in improper authorization. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. Impacted is an unknown function of the file /sys/tenant/deleteBatch. The manipulation of the argument ids leads to improper authorization. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The complexity of an attack is rather high. The exploitability is considered difficult. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in JeecgBoot up to 3.8.2. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file /api/getDepartUserList. Executing manipulation of the argument departId can lead to improper authorization. The attack can be executed remotely. This attack is characterized by high complexity. The exploitability is assessed as difficult. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 2.1
Severity: HIGH
AV:N/AC:H/Au:S/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 2.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X