Comparison Overview

ioneteam

VS

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

ioneteam

Calle de Antonio López, 249 Cuarta Planta, Puerta A Bis Madrid, Community of Madrid 28041, ES
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)
Between 900 and 1000
https://www.ioneteam.es

Excellent

Ayudamos a departamentos de informática a optimizar sus procesos, definiendo e implantando aquellas tecnologías que permitan automatizar procesos rutinarios de gestión, aportar alta capacidad técnica gracias a herramientas específicas y, reducir costes. En iONE estamos comprometidos con la calidad y el buen servicio. Sabemos que la satisfacción del cliente es lo primero, por ello partimos de un modelo de servicios adaptados a las necesidades del cliente con el objetivo de asegurar resultados inmejorables en las implantaciones de productos TI, así como prestar servicios profesionales y asistencias técnicas con equipo altamente cualificado. La excelencia de nuestro servicio está en la alta eficacia del sistema productivo y su flexibilidad, permitiendo ser extremadamente ágiles cubriendo las necesidades de cada cliente.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 51-200
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Amazon Web Services (AWS)

410 Terry Ave N, None, Seattle, WA, US, 98019
Last Update: 2025-07-25 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900
http://aws.amazon.com

Launched in 2006, Amazon Web Services (AWS) began exposing key infrastructure services to businesses in the form of web services -- now widely known as cloud computing. The ultimate benefit of cloud computing, and AWS, is the ability to leverage a new business model and turn capital infrastructure expenses into variable costs. Businesses no longer need to plan and procure servers and other IT resources weeks or months in advance. Using AWS, businesses can take advantage of Amazon's expertise and economies of scale to access resources when their business needs them, delivering results faster and at a lower cost. Today, Amazon Web Services provides a highly reliable, scalable, low-cost infrastructure platform in the cloud that powers hundreds of thousands of businesses in 190 countries around the world. With data center locations in the U.S., Europe, Singapore, and Japan, customers across all industries are taking advantage of our low cost, elastic, open and flexible, secure platform.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 139,764
Subsidiaries: 83
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
4
Attack type number
4

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ione-team.jpeg
ioneteam
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazon-web-services.jpeg
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
ioneteam
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ioneteam in 2025.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) has 391.8% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — ioneteam (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ioneteam cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Amazon Web Services (AWS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Amazon Web Services (AWS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ione-team.jpeg
ioneteam
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/amazon-web-services.jpeg
Amazon Web Services (AWS)
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Exposed Docker API, Misconfigured AWS EC2 Instances, Python Docker SDK
Motivation: Financial Gain, Disruption, Cybercrime-as-a-Service
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Insider Threat (Malicious or Accidental), Compromised AWS Credentials, Policy Manipulation
Motivation: Data Exfiltration, Unauthorized Data Access, Covert Persistence, Accidental Exposure
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Local Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Privilege Escalation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

ioneteam company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Amazon Web Services (AWS) company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas ioneteam company has not reported any.

In the current year, Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has reported more cyber incidents than ioneteam company.

Neither Amazon Web Services (AWS) company nor ioneteam company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has disclosed at least one data breach, while ioneteam company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while ioneteam company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while ioneteam company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to ioneteam company.

Amazon Web Services (AWS) company employs more people globally than ioneteam company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper Protection Against Voltage and Clock Glitches in FPGA devices, could allow an attacker with physical access to undervolt the platform resulting in a loss of confidentiality.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Malicious code was inserted into the Nx (build system) package and several related plugins. The tampered package was published to the npm software registry, via a supply-chain attack. Affected versions contain code that scans the file system, collects credentials, and posts them to GitHub as a repo under user's accounts.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In versions from 2.1.0 to before 2.3.0, the API endpoint GET /api/problems/:id returns challenge hints in plaintext within the question object, regardless of whether the user has unlocked them via point deduction. Users can view all hints for free, undermining the business logic of the platform and reducing the integrity of the challenge system. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

Flag Forge is a Capture The Flag (CTF) platform. In version 2.1.0, the /api/admin/assign-badge endpoint lacks proper access control, allowing any authenticated user to assign high-privilege badges (e.g., Staff) to themselves. This could lead to privilege escalation and impersonation of administrative roles. This issue has been patched in version 2.2.0.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:N
References
Description

parse is a package designed to parse JavaScript SDK. A Prototype Pollution vulnerability in the SingleInstanceStateController.initializeState function of parse version 5.3.0 and before allows attackers to inject properties on Object.prototype via supplying a crafted payload, causing denial of service (DoS) as the minimum consequence.

Published
Date
2025-09-24
Updated
Date
2025-09-24
References