Comparison Overview

Invision

VS

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC

Invision

11900 W 87th St, Lenexa, US, 66215
Last Update: 2025-11-25
Between 750 and 799

Today’s smart business wants a technology partner to be an extension of its own company… a partner that thinks like it thinks and acts like it acts. Today’s smart business needs a technology partner to do whatever it takes to keep business moving. At Invision, we have very smart clients. That’s why they’re successful. And they expect us to be equally adept at our business. Smart Business counts on Invision to provide technology leadership with a partnership mindset. We encourage you to view our site to learn more, but we really hope you’ll call and get to know us.

NAICS: 51125
NAICS Definition: Software Publishers
Employees: 24
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC

150 N. Radnor Chester Road, Radnor, PA 19087, US
Last Update: 2025-11-21

Located in Radnor, PA, Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC (www.spidernetconsulting.com) is a leader in small business technology consulting services. Spidernet focuses primarily on the planning, implementation, and management of Microsoft server and desktop technologies. We are an exciting and innovative company with a diversified portfolio of clients in the professional services, manufacturing, commercial contracting, and nonprofit business sectors.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invision.jpeg
Invision
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spidernet-technical-consulting-llc.jpeg
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Invision
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Invision in 2025.

Incidents vs Computer Networking Products Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC in 2025.

Incident History — Invision (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Invision cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invision.jpeg
Invision
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spidernet-technical-consulting-llc.jpeg
Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Invision company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Invision company.

In the current year, Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company and Invision company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company nor Invision company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company nor Invision company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company nor Invision company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Invision company nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Invision company nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Invision company employs more people globally than Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Computer Networking Products.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Invision nor Spidernet Technical Consulting, LLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.