Comparison Overview

Invictus Chambers

VS

Ediplis Counsels

Invictus Chambers

1 Mitre Court Buildings, Temple, London, undefined, EC4Y 7BS, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Invictus Chambers is a vibrant and approachable multi-disciplinary set of chambers based in the Temple within the City of London; in Bristol City Centre and in Southern Birmingham. Offering expertise at all levels of call in civil, commercial, criminal, family and immigration law, our barristers receive instructions from established firms of solicitors, local and enforcement authorities and licensed access holders throughout England and Wales in addition to undertaking direct public access work. We can also be instructed in relation to international matters within our areas of practice. Our barristers appear before all levels of the judiciary and quasi-judicial bodies representing both claimants and defendants, applicants, respondents, interested parties and the prosecution and defence. Our members include both experienced mediation advocates and qualified mediators, allowing us to provide professional dispute resolution services to parties both in and outside the litigation sphere. Please feel free to browse our website for further details of our areas of work and services and do not hesitate to contact our administration team for further information or to discuss any potential booking.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ediplis Counsels

Bangalore (Bengaluru), IN
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Ediplis Counsels is an award-winning law-firm. This firm’s initiation was based on an ideological disruption. The disruption of an ideology that law is about resolving disputes and attorneys should be approached for dispute resolution support only! Ediplis was formed by a group of individuals who had nothing in common other than their aspiration to make law simple and understandable for businesses and making law a tool for harnessing business potential.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invictus-chambers-london.jpeg
Invictus Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ediplis-counsels.jpeg
Ediplis Counsels
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Invictus Chambers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ediplis Counsels
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Invictus Chambers in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ediplis Counsels in 2025.

Incident History — Invictus Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Invictus Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ediplis Counsels (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ediplis Counsels cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/invictus-chambers-london.jpeg
Invictus Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ediplis-counsels.jpeg
Ediplis Counsels
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Invictus Chambers company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ediplis Counsels company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ediplis Counsels company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Invictus Chambers company.

In the current year, Ediplis Counsels company and Invictus Chambers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ediplis Counsels company nor Invictus Chambers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ediplis Counsels company nor Invictus Chambers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ediplis Counsels company nor Invictus Chambers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Invictus Chambers company nor Ediplis Counsels company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Invictus Chambers company nor Ediplis Counsels company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Invictus Chambers company and Ediplis Counsels company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Invictus Chambers nor Ediplis Counsels holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X