Comparison Overview

Investor AB

VS

Ghadir Investment Company

Investor AB

Arsenalsgatan 8 C, Stockholm, 10332, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

Investor, founded by the Wallenberg family a hundred years ago, is the leading owner of Nordic-based international companies. We own significant minority or majority interests in high quality companies. Through our participation on the boards of directors, we work for continuous improvement of the performance of the companies. With our industrial experience, network and financial strength we strive to make our companies best-in-class. Our cash flow allows us to support strategic initiatives in our companies, capture investment opportunities and provide our shareholders with a dividend. Our holdings include among others SEB, Atlas Copco, ABB, Ericsson and the wholly-owned subsidiary Mölnlycke Health Care.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 359
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Ghadir Investment Company

Tehran Province, Tehran، Sarv St,No 58 tehran, Tehran 1968944168, IR
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 700 and 749

Ghadir Investment Company has been established in 1992-93 as a public joint stock company (Initially named “Bank Saderat Investment Co. – Private Joint Stock). It commenced its operations in a wide variety of business fields and by managing over 120 subsidiary companies. Later in 1996, this company became listed in the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) and henceforth, it entered a new phase of sustainable competitive advantage and profitability. Today, Ghadir Investment Company is the largest TSE listed investment company which, through its 8 holdings and its 140 subsidiaries, operates in various sectors such as oil, gas, petrochemicals, cement, building construction, mines and related industries, marine and transportation, power and energy, financial services and commercial activities as well as information technology and information communication technology.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/investor-ab.jpeg
Investor AB
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ghadir-investment-company.jpeg
Ghadir Investment Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Investor AB
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Ghadir Investment Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Investor AB in 2025.

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Ghadir Investment Company in 2025.

Incident History — Investor AB (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Investor AB cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Ghadir Investment Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ghadir Investment Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/investor-ab.jpeg
Investor AB
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ghadir-investment-company.jpeg
Ghadir Investment Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Investor AB company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Ghadir Investment Company company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Ghadir Investment Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Investor AB company.

In the current year, Ghadir Investment Company company and Investor AB company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Ghadir Investment Company company nor Investor AB company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Ghadir Investment Company company nor Investor AB company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Ghadir Investment Company company nor Investor AB company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Investor AB company nor Ghadir Investment Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Investor AB company nor Ghadir Investment Company company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Ghadir Investment Company company employs more people globally than Investor AB company, reflecting its scale as a Investment Management.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Investor AB nor Ghadir Investment Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H