Comparison Overview

Intuitive

VS

Smith+Nephew

Intuitive

1020 Kifer Road, Building 108, California, 94086, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849

Intuitive (Nasdaq: ISRG), headquartered in Sunnyvale, Calif., is a global technology leader in minimally invasive care and the pioneer of robotic-assisted surgery. At Intuitive, we believe that minimally invasive care is life-enhancing care. Through ingenuity and intelligent technology, we expand the potential of physicians to heal without constraints.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 11,223
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Smith+Nephew

5 Hatters Lane, Watford, Hertfordshire, GB, WD18 8YE
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Smith+Nephew is a global medical technology company. We design and manufacture technology that takes the limits off living. We support healthcare professionals to return their patients to health and mobility, helping them to perform at their fullest potential. From our first employee and founder, T.J. Smith, to our team today, it’s our people who make Smith+Nephew a unique place. Yes, we love to innovate and develop exciting technologies, and we offer competitive salaries and progressive benefits. But it’s our culture - of Care, Collaboration and Courage - that really sets us apart. Through a spirit of ownership and can-do attitude, we work together to win.. We’re a company of people who care about each other, about our customers and their patients, and about our communities. Together, we fulfill our shared purpose of Life Unlimited. Please note: not all products referred to may be approved for use or available in all markets.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 18,703
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuitive-surgical.jpeg
Intuitive
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-nephew.jpeg
Smith+Nephew
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intuitive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Smith+Nephew
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intuitive in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Smith+Nephew in 2025.

Incident History — Intuitive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intuitive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Smith+Nephew (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Smith+Nephew cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuitive-surgical.jpeg
Intuitive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/smith-nephew.jpeg
Smith+Nephew
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intuitive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Smith+Nephew company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Smith+Nephew company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intuitive company.

In the current year, Smith+Nephew company and Intuitive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Smith+Nephew company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Smith+Nephew company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Smith+Nephew company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intuitive company nor Smith+Nephew company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intuitive company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Smith+Nephew company.

Smith+Nephew company employs more people globally than Intuitive company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Smith+Nephew holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N