Comparison Overview

Intuitive

VS

Danaher Corporation

Intuitive

1020 Kifer Road, Building 108, California, 94086, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.intuitive.com

Intuitive (Nasdaq: ISRG), headquartered in Sunnyvale, Calif., is a global technology leader in minimally invasive care and the pioneer of robotic-assisted surgery. At Intuitive, we believe that minimally invasive care is life-enhancing care. Through ingenuity and intelligent technology, we expand the potential of physicians to heal without constraints.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 11,223
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Danaher Corporation

2200 Pennsylvania Ave NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20037, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 800 and 849
http://www.danaher.com

Danaher is a leading global life sciences and diagnostics innovator, committed to accelerating the power of science and technology to improve human health. We partner with customers across the globe to help them solve their most complex challenges, architecting solutions that bring the power of science to life. Our global teams are pioneering what’s next across Life Sciences, Diagnostics, Biotechnology and beyond. For more information, visit www.danaher.com.

NAICS: 3391
NAICS Definition: Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing
Employees: 53,849
Subsidiaries: 43
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuitive-surgical.jpeg
Intuitive
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danaher.jpeg
Danaher Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intuitive
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danaher Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intuitive in 2025.

Incidents vs Medical Equipment Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danaher Corporation in 2025.

Incident History — Intuitive (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intuitive cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danaher Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danaher Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intuitive-surgical.jpeg
Intuitive
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danaher.jpeg
Danaher Corporation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intuitive company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Danaher Corporation company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Danaher Corporation company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intuitive company.

In the current year, Danaher Corporation company and Intuitive company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Danaher Corporation company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danaher Corporation company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Danaher Corporation company nor Intuitive company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intuitive company nor Danaher Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danaher Corporation company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Intuitive company.

Danaher Corporation company employs more people globally than Intuitive company, reflecting its scale as a Medical Equipment Manufacturing.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intuitive nor Danaher Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
References
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Published
Date
2025-12-14
Updated
Date
2025-12-14
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References