Comparison Overview

Intesa Sanpaolo

VS

CIB Egypt

Intesa Sanpaolo

Piazza San Carlo 156, Turin, TO, 10121, IT
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Intesa Sanpaolo è il maggior gruppo bancario in Italia con una significativa presenza internazionale. Il suo business model distintivo la rende leader a livello europeo nel Wealth Management, Protection & Advisory e ne caratterizza l’orientamento al digitale. I’impegno in ambito ESG prevede, entro il 2025, €115 miliardi di finanziamenti impact e contributi per 500 milioni a supporto delle persone in difficoltà. Gallerie d’Italia, è la sede espositiva del patrimonio artistico della banca e di progetti artistici di riconosciuto valore. https://group.intesasanpaolo.com/it/ _______________ Intesa Sanpaolo is the largest banking group in Italy with a significant international presence. Its distinctive business model makes it a European leader in wealth management, protection and advisory and ensures its strong focus on digital. Its commitment to ESG foresees, by 2025, €115 billion of impact financing and contributions of €500 million to support people in need. Gallerie d'Italia, is the exhibition venue for the bank's artistic heritage and artistic projects of recognised value. https://group.intesasanpaolo.com/en/ _________________ Sede Legale: Piazza San Carlo 156, 10121 Torino – Sede Secondaria: Via Monte di Pietà 8, 20121 Milano Tel. 011 555.1 – mail: [email protected] pec: [email protected] Registro delle Imprese di Torino e Codice Fiscale 00799960158 – Partita Iva 10810700152 N. Iscr. Albo Banche 5361 N. Iscr. Registro degli Intermediari Assicurativi e Riassicurativi - Sez. D. 000027210, data di iscrizione 01.02.2007 - Intermediario soggetto alla vigilanza dell'IVASS: https://servizi.ivass.it/RuirPubblica Per la presentazione dei reclami e eventuali sistemi di risoluzione delle controversie https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/persone-e-famiglie/reclami.html. Per assistenza: https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/common/parla-con-noi.html. Netiquette: https://www.intesasanpaolo.com/it/common/landing/anti-phishing/netiquette.html

NAICS: 52211
NAICS Definition: Commercial Banking
Employees: 57,864
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CIB Egypt

21/23 Charles De Gaulle Giza. P.O. Box 2430 Cairo, Egypt., Giza, undefined, 11213, EG
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Commercial International Bank was established in 1975 as a joint venture between the National Bank of Egypt (NBE, 51%) and the Chase Manhattan Bank (49%) under the name "Chase National Bank of Egypt”. Following Chase's decision to divest its equity stake in 1987, NBE increased its shareholding to 99.9%, changing the Bank’s name to Commercial International Bank (Egypt) S.A.E. NBE’s stake gradually decreased through several public offerings till reaching 18.7%. In 2006, a Consortium led by Ripplewood Holdings acquired NBE stake. In July 2009, Actis, a leading emerging markets private equity firm, invested US$ 244 million to get shares in CIB, acquiring hence 50% of the Ripplewood Holdings Consortium’s stake. Five months later, Ripplewood sold its remaining 4.7% stake over the open market, marking the successful transition of strategic partnership to be with Actis, who then became CIB’s largest shareholder with a 9.1% stake. In March 2014,Actis sold a portion of its holding, representing 2.6% of the Bank’s total outstanding shares, in the open market to a group of international investors. In May 2014, Actis, successfully realised its investment in CIB and sold its remaining 6.5% to Subsidiaries wholly owned by Fairfax Financial Holdings Ltd “Fairfax”. CIB is Egypt’s leading private sector bank, offering a broad range of financial products and services to its customers, including enterprises of all sizes, institutions, households and high-net worth individuals. CIB strives to provide superior financial solutions to meet all customers’ needs. Having the strongest brand equity rightfully places CIB as the bank of choice for over 500 of Egypt’s largest corporations. CIB shows tremendous potential within the bourgeoning Retail and SME Banking markets. Through its superior management, high-operating standards, corporate governance best practices and training programs,CIB has succeeded in becoming the most profitable commercial bank operating in Egypt for more than 40 years.

NAICS: 522
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 15,324
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intesa-sanpaolo.jpeg
Intesa Sanpaolo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intesa Sanpaolo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CIB Egypt
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intesa Sanpaolo in 2025.

Incidents vs Banking Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CIB Egypt in 2025.

Incident History — Intesa Sanpaolo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intesa Sanpaolo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CIB Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CIB Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intesa-sanpaolo.jpeg
Intesa Sanpaolo
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cibegypt.jpeg
CIB Egypt
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Intesa Sanpaolo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CIB Egypt company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CIB Egypt company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intesa Sanpaolo company.

In the current year, CIB Egypt company and Intesa Sanpaolo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor Intesa Sanpaolo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor Intesa Sanpaolo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CIB Egypt company nor Intesa Sanpaolo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo company nor CIB Egypt company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Intesa Sanpaolo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CIB Egypt company.

Intesa Sanpaolo company employs more people globally than CIB Egypt company, reflecting its scale as a Banking.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intesa Sanpaolo nor CIB Egypt holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N