Comparison Overview

Interview Magazine

VS

Madhouse Media Publishing

Interview Magazine

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26

Created in 1969 by Andy Warhol, Interview has, for the past half-decade, been built on a simple conceit: put two interesting people together and turn on a tape recorder. The publication of today unifies the best of Interview’s many eras — the film journal of the ’70s, the society rag of the ’80s, the Hollywood-obsessed monthly of the ’90s and aughts, and the fashion glossy of the teens—while making it feel fresh and alive and un-put-downable for the readers of now.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 83
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Madhouse Media Publishing

undefined, Port Macquarie, NSW, 2444, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-26

As a writer considering self publishing you need to confront this simple fact. You can’t do it all by yourself. Madhouse Media Publishing was created to help writers like you navigate the difficult technical and creative obstacles you’ll face when you decide to self publish. We can make sure your book has a great cover and layout design and also meets the stringent technical standards for publishing on Amazon, Google Play and Apple iBook Store. We can also help design and build your author’s platform and launch your book with a marketing campaign to suit your budget. Check out our starter packages, or contact for an obligation free quotation on your project.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interview-magazine.jpeg
Interview Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madhousemedia.jpeg
Madhouse Media Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interview Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Madhouse Media Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interview Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Madhouse Media Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — Interview Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interview Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Madhouse Media Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Madhouse Media Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interview-magazine.jpeg
Interview Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/madhousemedia.jpeg
Madhouse Media Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Madhouse Media Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interview Magazine company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Madhouse Media Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interview Magazine company.

In the current year, Madhouse Media Publishing company and Interview Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing company nor Interview Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing company nor Interview Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Madhouse Media Publishing company nor Interview Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interview Magazine company nor Madhouse Media Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Interview Magazine company nor Madhouse Media Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interview Magazine company employs more people globally than Madhouse Media Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interview Magazine nor Madhouse Media Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.