Comparison Overview

Interspiro

VS

Springfort Precision Engineering

Interspiro

Kemistvägen 21, Täby, Stockholm, 183 79, SE
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

At Interspiro, we’ve worked for almost a hundred years to keep professionals breathing in hazardous environments. Many of our technological breakthroughs in breathing equipment have become industry standard, such as 300 bar and positive pressure. Today our equipment is used by firefighters and divers all over the world, and we work in close partnership with fire and rescue services, defense, shipping and heavy industry to meet and exceed their requirements. Interspiro is a member of the Ocenco Group and our headquarters is located in Stockholm, Sweden.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 124
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Springfort Precision Engineering

Unit 6, Carn Business Park, Carn Road, Portadown, Craigavon, Co.Armagh, BT63 5WG, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27

At Springfort Precision Engineering, we pride ourselves on our exceptional capability to deliver high-quality CNC Manufacturing in a wide range of materials including aluminium, brass, mild steel, stainless steel, and engineering plastics. As an AS9100 & ISO9001 accredited company, we specialise in advanced multi-axis CNC machining, offering bespoke engineering solutions at competitive prices. Utilising the latest CNC machine tools and technology, our highly skilled team is committed to precision and excellence.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interspiro.jpeg
Interspiro
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfort-precision-engineering.jpeg
Springfort Precision Engineering
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interspiro
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Springfort Precision Engineering
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interspiro in 2025.

Incidents vs Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Springfort Precision Engineering in 2025.

Incident History — Interspiro (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interspiro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Springfort Precision Engineering (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Springfort Precision Engineering cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interspiro.jpeg
Interspiro
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/springfort-precision-engineering.jpeg
Springfort Precision Engineering
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Interspiro company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Springfort Precision Engineering company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Springfort Precision Engineering company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interspiro company.

In the current year, Springfort Precision Engineering company and Interspiro company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Interspiro company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Interspiro company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Springfort Precision Engineering company nor Interspiro company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interspiro company nor Springfort Precision Engineering company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Interspiro company nor Springfort Precision Engineering company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interspiro company employs more people globally than Springfort Precision Engineering company, reflecting its scale as a Mechanical Or Industrial Engineering.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interspiro nor Springfort Precision Engineering holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H