Comparison Overview

INTERPRINT Group

VS

Trend Offset Printing

INTERPRINT Group

Westring 22, Arnsberg, 59759, DE
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://interprint.com/

With more than 1,600 employees at 9 production sites worldwide, Interprint is one of the leading international decor printers. "Think global, act local" – this has been Interprint's philosophy for more than 50 years. Since 2019, we have been part of the Japanese Toppan Group, which increases the variety of products and technical possibilities. Our designs are at home all over the world where they are used for the surfaces of furniture and floors. What we do… We print decor papers with wood, stone and other creative designs that are further processed for use as surfaces for furniture and laminate flooring or wood-based materials for interior design. Interprint's product portfolio includes decor papers and finish foils, melamine films, water-resistant foils and other product innovations – produced using gravure printing or industrial digital printing. interprint.com A TOPPAN COMPANY

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 606
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Trend Offset Printing

3701 Catalina St., Los Alamitos, CA, 90720, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://www.trendoffset.com

As one of the leading full-service commercial printers in North America, we specialize in web offset and digital printing of publications; magazines, catalogs, advertising and direct mail. Our plants are strategically located in Los Alamitos, California (company headquarters); Carrollton, Texas (suburban Dallas); and Jacksonville, Florida We have created a national platform of customer-focused print solutions by replicating our best practices at our plants across the country.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 422
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interprint-group.jpeg
INTERPRINT Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-offset-printing.jpeg
Trend Offset Printing
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INTERPRINT Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Trend Offset Printing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INTERPRINT Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Trend Offset Printing in 2025.

Incident History — INTERPRINT Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INTERPRINT Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Trend Offset Printing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trend Offset Printing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interprint-group.jpeg
INTERPRINT Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/trend-offset-printing.jpeg
Trend Offset Printing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

INTERPRINT Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Trend Offset Printing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Trend Offset Printing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INTERPRINT Group company.

In the current year, Trend Offset Printing company and INTERPRINT Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor INTERPRINT Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor INTERPRINT Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Trend Offset Printing company nor INTERPRINT Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INTERPRINT Group company nor Trend Offset Printing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Trend Offset Printing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to INTERPRINT Group company.

INTERPRINT Group company employs more people globally than Trend Offset Printing company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INTERPRINT Group nor Trend Offset Printing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References