Comparison Overview

International Women's Air & Space Museum

VS

Foss Waterway Seaport

International Women's Air & Space Museum

1501 N. Marginal Road, Cleveland, OH, 44114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The mission of the International Women's Air & Space Museum is to collect, preserve, and showcase the history and culture of women in all areas of aviation & aerospace; educate people of the world about their contributions; and inspire future generations by bringing the history to life. The museum is located at Burke Lakefront Airport in downtown Cleveland, OH. Museum admission is free!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Foss Waterway Seaport

undefined, undefined, undefined, 98421, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Foss Waterway Seaport is dedicated to celebrating Tacoma's rich maritime heritage — past, present, and future. The development partners of this project — the Foss Waterway Seaport and the Foss Waterway Development Authority — are creating a venue bringing downtown Tacoma's gathering place to life and providing waterfront public access for the rich teaching platform provided by Commencement Bay and Puget Sound. When fully completed, the Seaport will be the most comprehensive maritime heritage and education center on the US west coast and the only authentic Pacific Northwest facility to showcase the region's maritime history in a location where that history actually took place!

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 26
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-women's-air-&-space-museum.jpeg
International Women's Air & Space Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Women's Air & Space Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Foss Waterway Seaport
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Women's Air & Space Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Foss Waterway Seaport in 2026.

Incident History — International Women's Air & Space Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Women's Air & Space Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Foss Waterway Seaport (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Foss Waterway Seaport cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-women's-air-&-space-museum.jpeg
International Women's Air & Space Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/foss-waterway-seaport.jpeg
Foss Waterway Seaport
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Foss Waterway Seaport company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Women's Air & Space Museum company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Foss Waterway Seaport company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Women's Air & Space Museum company.

In the current year, Foss Waterway Seaport company and International Women's Air & Space Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor International Women's Air & Space Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor International Women's Air & Space Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Foss Waterway Seaport company nor International Women's Air & Space Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum company nor Foss Waterway Seaport company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Foss Waterway Seaport company employs more people globally than International Women's Air & Space Museum company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Women's Air & Space Museum nor Foss Waterway Seaport holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H