Comparison Overview

International Spy Museum

VS

Sheffield Museums

International Spy Museum

700 L'Enfant Plaza SW, Washington, 20024 , US
Last Update: 2026-01-22
Between 750 and 799

The International Spy Museum, a 501(c)(3) private non-profit, opened in Washington, DC on July 19, 2002. It is the only public museum in the United States solely dedicated to espionage and the only one in the world to provide a global perspective on an all-but-invisible profession that has shaped history and continues to have a significant impact on world events. The Museum features the largest collection of international espionage artifacts ever placed on public display. Many of these objects are being seen by the public for the first time. These artifacts illuminate the work of famous spies and pivotal espionage actions as well as help bring to life the strategies and techniques of the men and women behind some of the most secretive espionage missions in world history. The mission of the International Spy Museum is to educate the public about espionage and intelligence in an engaging way and to provide a context that fosters understanding of their important role in and impact on current and historic events. The Museum focuses on human intelligence and reveals the role spies have played in world events throughout history. It is committed to the apolitical presentation of the history of espionage in order to provide visitors with nonbiased, accurate information.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 183
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Sheffield Museums

Arundel Gate, Sheffield, GB, S1 2PP
Last Update: 2026-01-17

Sheffield Museums Trust is the independent charity that operates six of the city’s leading museums and heritage sites: Abbeydale Industrial Hamlet, Graves Gallery, Kelham Island Museum, Millennium Gallery, Shepherd Wheel and Weston Park Museum. Established in 2021, the charity cares for the city’s collections of art, human and industrial history, and natural science, alongside the Guild of St George’s John Ruskin collection and is home to the Ken Hawley Collection Trust’s Hawley Tool Collection. We work with our communities to tell the remarkable story of Sheffield and its people, and celebrate its reputation for excellence in craft, making and innovation. Together with local, regional and national partners, we showcase home-grown creative talent and bring outstanding cultural experiences to the city.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 117
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-spy-museum.jpeg
International Spy Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Spy Museum
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sheffield Museums
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Spy Museum in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sheffield Museums in 2026.

Incident History — International Spy Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Spy Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sheffield Museums (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sheffield Museums cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-spy-museum.jpeg
International Spy Museum
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/sheffieldmuseums.jpeg
Sheffield Museums
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Spy Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sheffield Museums company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sheffield Museums company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Spy Museum company.

In the current year, Sheffield Museums company and International Spy Museum company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor International Spy Museum company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor International Spy Museum company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sheffield Museums company nor International Spy Museum company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Spy Museum company nor Sheffield Museums company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither International Spy Museum company nor Sheffield Museums company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

International Spy Museum company employs more people globally than Sheffield Museums company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Spy Museum nor Sheffield Museums holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H