Comparison Overview

Print Center New York

VS

Charles Dickens Museum

Print Center New York

535 W 24th St, New York, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

International Print Center New York was established in Chelsea in September 2000 as the first and only non-profit institution devoted solely to the exhibition and understanding of fine art prints. IPCNY fosters a climate for enjoyment, examination and serious study of artists' prints from the old master to the contemporary. IPCNY nurtures the growth of new audiences for the visual arts while serving the print community through exhibitions, publications, and educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Charles Dickens Museum

48Doughty St, London, Greater London WC1N 2LX, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-02
Between 750 and 799

Charles Dickens Museum holds one of the most important collections of Dickens ephemera in the world. The Museum is based at 48 Doughty Street in Charles Dickens’s only surviving London family home. Dickens lived in this house from 1837 until 1839 and wrote Oliver Twist and Nicholas Nickleby whilst living here. We offer visitors the chance to step back in time and experience Dickens’s home as if he had just stepped out the door.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-print-center-new-york.jpeg
Print Center New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Print Center New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Charles Dickens Museum
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Center New York in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charles Dickens Museum in 2025.

Incident History — Print Center New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Center New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Charles Dickens Museum (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charles Dickens Museum cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-print-center-new-york.jpeg
Print Center New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-charles-dickens-museum-limited.jpeg
Charles Dickens Museum
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Charles Dickens Museum company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Print Center New York company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Charles Dickens Museum company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Print Center New York company.

In the current year, Charles Dickens Museum company and Print Center New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Charles Dickens Museum company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Print Center New York company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Print Center New York company nor Charles Dickens Museum company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Charles Dickens Museum company employs more people globally than Print Center New York company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Charles Dickens Museum holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X