Comparison Overview

Print Center New York

VS

Museum of Future Sports

Print Center New York

535 W 24th St, New York, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-12-03
Between 750 and 799

International Print Center New York was established in Chelsea in September 2000 as the first and only non-profit institution devoted solely to the exhibition and understanding of fine art prints. IPCNY fosters a climate for enjoyment, examination and serious study of artists' prints from the old master to the contemporary. IPCNY nurtures the growth of new audiences for the visual arts while serving the print community through exhibitions, publications, and educational programs.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 11
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Museum of Future Sports

undefined, San Francisco, CA, 94102, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799

Museum of Future Sports (MoFS) is a unique-in-class 501c3 non-profit organization launched by sports, gaming, technology & education industry pioneers. MoFS has developed a bespoke combination of educational innovation, entertainment technology & interactive platforms to provide technology access to all, especially under served communities, While supporting the growth of Future Sports communities through ground-breaking events and STEAM education programs. MoFS is a STEM education wonderland that offers ongoing educational programs, workshops and after school leagues focused on engineering, design, coding, game programing through the irresistible lens of sports and games.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-print-center-new-york.jpeg
Print Center New York
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mofs.jpeg
Museum of Future Sports
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Print Center New York
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Museum of Future Sports
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Print Center New York in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Museum of Future Sports in 2025.

Incident History — Print Center New York (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Print Center New York cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Museum of Future Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Museum of Future Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-print-center-new-york.jpeg
Print Center New York
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mofs.jpeg
Museum of Future Sports
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Print Center New York company and Museum of Future Sports company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Museum of Future Sports company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Print Center New York company.

In the current year, Museum of Future Sports company and Print Center New York company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Museum of Future Sports company nor Print Center New York company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Print Center New York company nor Museum of Future Sports company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Print Center New York company nor Museum of Future Sports company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Print Center New York company employs more people globally than Museum of Future Sports company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Print Center New York nor Museum of Future Sports holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ImageMagick is free and open-source software used for editing and manipulating digital images. Prior to 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34, there is a vulnerability in ImageMagick’s Magick++ layer that manifests when Options::fontFamily is invoked with an empty string. Clearing a font family calls RelinquishMagickMemory on _drawInfo->font, freeing the font string but leaving _drawInfo->font pointing to freed memory while _drawInfo->family is set to that (now-invalid) pointer. Any later cleanup or reuse of _drawInfo->font re-frees or dereferences dangling memory. DestroyDrawInfo and other setters (Options::font, Image::font) assume _drawInfo->font remains valid, so destruction or subsequent updates trigger crashes or heap corruption. This vulnerability is fixed in 7.1.2-9 and 6.9.13-34.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 has a Remote Code Execution via Unrestricted File Upload in Ad Management. FeehiCMS version 2.1.1 allows authenticated remote attackers to upload files that the server later executes (or stores in an executable location) without sufficient validation, sanitization, or execution restrictions. An authenticated remote attacker can upload a crafted PHP file and cause the application or web server to execute it, resulting in remote code execution (RCE).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

PHPGurukul Billing System 1.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the admin/index.php endpoint. Specifically, the username parameter accepts unvalidated user input, which is then concatenated directly into a backend SQL query.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

NMIS/BioDose software V22.02 and previous versions contain executable binaries with plain text hard-coded passwords. These hard-coded passwords could allow unauthorized access to both the application and database.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NMIS/BioDose V22.02 and previous versions' installation directory paths by default have insecure file permissions, which in certain deployment scenarios can enable users on client workstations to modify the program executables and libraries.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X