Comparison Overview

International Longevity Centre - UK

VS

Rota Group

International Longevity Centre - UK

36-37 Albert Embankment, London, England, SE1 7TL, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ilcuk.org.uk/index.php/home

The ILC is the UK’s specialist think tank on the impact of longevity on society, and what happens next. We believe society has to adapt now so we can all enjoy the benefits of longevity. We work with central government, local government, the private sector, and professional and academic associations in the UK and across the world to provoke conversations and pioneer solutions for a society where everyone can thrive, regardless of age. We know the numbers. We know the challenges. What happens next will define us for generations.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 37
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Rota Group

Via Enrico Berlinguer 1, Pozzo d'Adda, 20060, IT
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799
http://www.rotagroup.it/it/

Aluminium is our passion. We have always been committed to improve the research and management of such an eclectic and fascinating material. For this reason, we have decided to bring together under one single name the experience, relationships and know-how that the Rota Family has gained in the aluminium industry in over 40 years of work. The aluminum group is formed by Ossidazione Anodica: the company of excellence in the research and development of the sustainable oxidation processes of aluminum; and DVNE, the brand born to offer to the architecture market a Peraluman aluminum surface, with a peculiar texture: for indoor and outdoor cladding. Our goal is to provide skills and services throughout the production chain, from cutting alloys, to extrusion and oxidation processes, until the process management.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-longevity-centre.jpeg
International Longevity Centre - UK
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rota-group.jpeg
Rota Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Longevity Centre - UK
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rota Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Longevity Centre - UK in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rota Group in 2025.

Incident History — International Longevity Centre - UK (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Longevity Centre - UK cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rota Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rota Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-longevity-centre.jpeg
International Longevity Centre - UK
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rota-group.jpeg
Rota Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both International Longevity Centre - UK company and Rota Group company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Rota Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Longevity Centre - UK company.

In the current year, Rota Group company and International Longevity Centre - UK company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rota Group company nor International Longevity Centre - UK company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rota Group company nor International Longevity Centre - UK company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rota Group company nor International Longevity Centre - UK company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK company nor Rota Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK company nor Rota Group company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

International Longevity Centre - UK company employs more people globally than Rota Group company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Longevity Centre - UK nor Rota Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References