Comparison Overview

International Holding Company LLC

VS

Capgemini Invent

International Holding Company LLC

Palm Beach, 33402, US
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

International Holding Company, LLC (IHC) is a full services management and technology consulting firm. Utilizing our proprietary 4 Quadrant Methodology we teach companies to create a repeatable, measurable business which leads to breakthrough growth. The 4 Quadrant Methodology focuses on what the company is looking to become. Following our theory of building companies deep as an effort to maximize shareholder value, we develop plans and metrics that drives repeatable growth. While companies focus on creating greater shareholder value through repeatable growth, we work with executives and their boards in areas such as fundraising, cybersecurity implementation, risk management, AI integration, M&A, integration of acquired companies, and other areas outside tactical deployment. We focus on mid-tier organizations that require investments of expertise, resources, and talent to ensure their success and maximize shareholder value. IHC's management teams have practical experience derived from multiple successful ventures. IHC provides the resources, strategy, executive, management, operations, finance, technology, and marketing skills necessary to optimize enterprise performance and value.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Capgemini Invent

Place de l'Etoile, 11 rue de Tilsitt, Paris, undefined, 75017, FR
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Capgemini Invent is the digital innovation, consulting and transformation brand of the Capgemini Group, a global business line that combines market leading expertise in strategy, technology, data science and creative design, to help CxOs envision and build what’s next for their businesses. For more information: http://www.capgemini.com/invent. Follow us on Twitter @CapgeminiInvent.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 16,459
Subsidiaries: 37
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-holding-company.jpeg
International Holding Company LLC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Holding Company LLC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Capgemini Invent
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Holding Company LLC in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Capgemini Invent in 2025.

Incident History — International Holding Company LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Holding Company LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Capgemini Invent (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Capgemini Invent cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-holding-company.jpeg
International Holding Company LLC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/capgemini-invent.jpeg
Capgemini Invent
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Holding Company LLC company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Capgemini Invent company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Capgemini Invent company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Holding Company LLC company.

In the current year, Capgemini Invent company and International Holding Company LLC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor International Holding Company LLC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor International Holding Company LLC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Capgemini Invent company nor International Holding Company LLC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Holding Company LLC company nor Capgemini Invent company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Capgemini Invent company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to International Holding Company LLC company.

Capgemini Invent company employs more people globally than International Holding Company LLC company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Holding Company LLC nor Capgemini Invent holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H