Comparison Overview

International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

VS

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

International Container Terminal Services, Inc.

undefined, Manila, undefined, 1012, PH
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

International Container Terminal Services, Inc. (ICTSI) is the largest independent terminal operator across six continents. ICTSI builds and operates efficient and sustainable origin and destination gateway terminals in markets where we can leverage our competitive strength and create long-term sustainable value.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 701
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company

12-14 Chemin Rieu, Geneva, CH, 1208
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 800 and 849

MSC is a privately owned global shipping company founded in 1970 by Gianluigi Aponte. As one of the world’s leading container shipping lines with headquarters in Geneva, Switzerland, MSC operates in over 675 offices across more than 155 countries worldwide with over 200,000 MSC Group employees. With access to an integrated network of road, rail and sea transport resources which stretches across the globe, the company prides itself on delivering global service with local knowledge. OUR SERVICES MSC is a world leader in global container shipping and a company offering global service with local knowledge. MSC also provides integrated network of road, rail and sea transport resources which stretches across the globe. YOUR INDUSTRY Bringing you industry-specific expertise; whatever you’re shipping, wherever you’re shipping it. MSC delivers a professional, efficient service tailored to the specific needs of your business. Our services are designed around you.

NAICS: 47
NAICS Definition: Transportation and Warehousing
Employees: 33,889
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-container-terminal-services-inc..jpeg
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-mediterranean-shipping-co--s-a-.jpeg
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Container Terminal Services, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company in 2025.

Incident History — International Container Terminal Services, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Container Terminal Services, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-container-terminal-services-inc..jpeg
International Container Terminal Services, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/msc-mediterranean-shipping-co--s-a-.jpeg
MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Engineered targeted vulnerability
Blog: Blog

FAQ

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company has not reported any.

In the current year, MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company and International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company nor International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company nor International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company.

MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company company employs more people globally than International Container Terminal Services, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Transportation, Logistics, Supply Chain and Storage.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Container Terminal Services, Inc. nor MSC Mediterranean Shipping Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H