Comparison Overview

The ICCF Group

VS

Atlas Public Policy

The ICCF Group

25786 Georgetown Station, Washington, DC, 20027, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.iccfoundation.us

The International Conservation Caucus Foundation (ICCF) is a 501(c)(3) educational foundation promoting the projection of U.S. leadership for international conservation worldwide. For a decade, the mission of ICCF has been to serve as the nucleus for Congressional leadership for U.S. international conservation, in concert with the protection of U.S. business and national security interests worldwide. ICCF underpins the leadership of the bipartisan U.S. Congressional International Conservation Caucus (ICC), which comprises more than a third of the U.S. Congress. We educate policymakers on international issues of natural resource management throughout the legislative process. We are pro-business, pro-development, and pro-environment and are committed to market-oriented solutions for conservation and sustainability worldwide.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 65
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Atlas Public Policy

undefined, Washington, DC, undefined, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 700 and 749
https://www.atlaspolicy.com

Atlas Public Policy equips businesses and policymakers to make strategic, informed decisions that serve the public interest. Atlas builds analytical tools and dashboards using powerful, accessible technology, and offers expert advisory services to tackle the pressing issues of the day. Our key work areas currently include transportation and building electrification, climate policy, and disinformation tracking. More info is available at www.atlaspolicy.com.

NAICS: 921
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-conservation-caucus-foundation.jpeg
The ICCF Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-public-policy.jpeg
Atlas Public Policy
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
The ICCF Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Atlas Public Policy
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The ICCF Group in 2025.

Incidents vs Public Policy Offices Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Atlas Public Policy in 2025.

Incident History — The ICCF Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The ICCF Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Atlas Public Policy (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Atlas Public Policy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/international-conservation-caucus-foundation.jpeg
The ICCF Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/atlas-public-policy.jpeg
Atlas Public Policy
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The ICCF Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Atlas Public Policy company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Atlas Public Policy company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to The ICCF Group company.

In the current year, Atlas Public Policy company and The ICCF Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Atlas Public Policy company nor The ICCF Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Atlas Public Policy company nor The ICCF Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Atlas Public Policy company nor The ICCF Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither The ICCF Group company nor Atlas Public Policy company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Atlas Public Policy company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The ICCF Group company.

The ICCF Group company employs more people globally than Atlas Public Policy company, reflecting its scale as a Public Policy Offices.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds HIPAA certification.

Neither The ICCF Group nor Atlas Public Policy holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Published
Date
2025-11-26
Updated
Date
2025-11-26
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References