Comparison Overview

Interket Limited (an Interket Group member)

VS

Texas Envelope

Interket Limited (an Interket Group member)

Interket Limited Unit 2 – Vulcan, Adlington,, SK10 4ZN, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.interket.co.uk

Since 1976, Interket UK part of the most established label manufacturing group in Europe, has been serving the international print and packaging industry with award winning on-roll printed labels across a broad range of sectors utilising our flexo crisp dot and spotless technology. The Interket Group has its headquarters in Denmark with manufacturing sites in The Netherlands, United Kingdom, Germany, Sweden, and a Sales Office in France, overall combining an impressive and flexible infrastructure. Our unique in-house coating facility provides the perfect platform for NPD projects. This asset enables us to coat our own label stocks plus the ability to work on new products and applications in partnership with our customers. With digital & flexo capabilities we can produce labels from the core base material right through to print and conversion meaning we can offer market leading value.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Texas Envelope

None
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799
http://www.texenv.com

Texas Envelope specializes in manufacturing quality, custom envelopes. We provide exceptional service, while moving ultra fast. We are the best overall source for envelopes in the State of Texas. We have an outstanding sales and customer service team who can help you determine the best product for your needs. We have in-house design services and graphic design to bring all your ideas to life.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interket-limited.jpeg
Interket Limited (an Interket Group member)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-envelope.jpeg
Texas Envelope
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interket Limited (an Interket Group member)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Texas Envelope
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Texas Envelope in 2025.

Incident History — Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Texas Envelope (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Texas Envelope cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interket-limited.jpeg
Interket Limited (an Interket Group member)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/texas-envelope.jpeg
Texas Envelope
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Texas Envelope company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Texas Envelope company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company.

In the current year, Texas Envelope company and Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Texas Envelope company nor Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Texas Envelope company nor Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Texas Envelope company nor Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company nor Texas Envelope company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company nor Texas Envelope company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Texas Envelope company employs more people globally than Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interket Limited (an Interket Group member) nor Texas Envelope holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References