Comparison Overview

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts

VS

Milestone Pacific Hotel Group

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts

None
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

As the world's first truly global hotel brand, InterContinental Hotels & Resorts are located in more than 65 countries with local insights that come from over 75 years of experience. Experience luxury travel as it should be, whether you're travelling for work or pleasure, in over 200 global destinations. Visit us on our website: http://ihg.co/ICWebsiteLI

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 8,542
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Milestone Pacific Hotel Group

Jl. Kebon Sirih Raya kav 75 Jakarta Pusat, DKI Jakarta 10340, ID
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 750 and 799

Our Vision : Asia’s premier purveyor of designer affordable luxury hotels & design oriented value hotels focusing in the business travel market with particular strength in Indonesia and implementing asset-light strategy. Our Mission : Never to settle for anything less than excellence and will always dare to do better. By taking good care of our employees, they will take care of our guests. Finally, to design globally, adapt locally & appeal universally

NAICS: 721
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercontinental-hotels-&-resorts.jpeg
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/milestone-pacific-hotel-group.jpeg
Milestone Pacific Hotel Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Milestone Pacific Hotel Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InterContinental Hotels & Resorts in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Milestone Pacific Hotel Group in 2025.

Incident History — InterContinental Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Milestone Pacific Hotel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Milestone Pacific Hotel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercontinental-hotels-&-resorts.jpeg
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/milestone-pacific-hotel-group.jpeg
Milestone Pacific Hotel Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company and InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company nor InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company.

Milestone Pacific Hotel Group company employs more people globally than InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Milestone Pacific Hotel Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H