Comparison Overview

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts

VS

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts

None
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 750 and 799

As the world's first truly global hotel brand, InterContinental Hotels & Resorts are located in more than 65 countries with local insights that come from over 75 years of experience. Experience luxury travel as it should be, whether you're travelling for work or pleasure, in over 200 global destinations. Visit us on our website: http://ihg.co/ICWebsiteLI

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 8,542
Subsidiaries: 5
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts

1165 Leslie Street, None, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M3C 2K8
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 800 and 849

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts opened its first hotel in 1961, and since that time has been dedicated to perfecting the travel experience through continual innovation and the highest standards of hospitality. Currently operating more than 120 hotels and resorts, and more than 50 residential properties in major city centers and resort destinations in 47 countries, and with more than 50 projects under planning or development, Four Seasons consistently ranks among the world's best hotels and most prestigious brands in reader polls, traveler reviews and industry awards. To learn more about our career opportunities, visit fourseasons.com/careers. For more information and reservations, visit fourseasons.com. For the latest news, visit press.fourseasons.com and follow @FourSeasonsPR on Twitter.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 39,511
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercontinental-hotels-&-resorts.jpeg
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for InterContinental Hotels & Resorts in 2025.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts in 2025.

Incident History — InterContinental Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intercontinental-hotels-&-resorts.jpeg
InterContinental Hotels & Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 09/2022
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2016
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/four-seasons-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2016
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company.

In the current year, Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company and InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company nor InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company and InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company.

Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts company employs more people globally than InterContinental Hotels & Resorts company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither InterContinental Hotels & Resorts nor Four Seasons Hotels and Resorts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H