Comparison Overview

Interblock Gaming

VS

Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise

Interblock Gaming

6900 S Decatur Blvd, Suite 100, Las Vegas, Nevada, US, 89118
Last Update: 2025-11-28

Interblock®, established in 1989, is recognized worldwide for high quality, multi-player machines that provide the ultimate in luxury interactive entertainment experiences. Fully and semi automated electronic gaming tables as well as video gaming solutions by Interblock provide casinos, arcades and gambling halls superior product performance and their guests an unforgettable gaming experience. The company’s multiplayer gaming machines are setting new industry standards that have earned the brand its position as market leader in its business segment. The Interblock brand is synonymous with state-of-the-art gaming solutions with global market presence and superior technical support in more than 200 jurisdictions. For more information, please visit (http://www.interblockgaming.com/) or call 702 260-1384. Instagram @InterblockGaming Facebook & Twitter @InterblockNews

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 366
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise

11277 Hwy 99, Seminole, 74868, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise (SNGE) is an entity of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma. We proudly operate three casinos within the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma territory, Seminole Nation Casino, Wewoka Trading Post Casino and River Mist Casino. We offer Class II and Class III games for your gaming pleasure. SNGE is continuously focusing on improving the gaming experience and excitement for our patrons. We welcome friends to visit our facilities where Winning Is FUN!

NAICS: 7132
NAICS Definition: Gambling Industries
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interblockgaming.jpeg
Interblock Gaming
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seminole-nation-gaming-enterprise.jpeg
Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Interblock Gaming
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Interblock Gaming in 2025.

Incidents vs Gambling Facilities and Casinos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise in 2025.

Incident History — Interblock Gaming (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Interblock Gaming cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/interblockgaming.jpeg
Interblock Gaming
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seminole-nation-gaming-enterprise.jpeg
Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Interblock Gaming company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Interblock Gaming company.

In the current year, Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company and Interblock Gaming company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company nor Interblock Gaming company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company nor Interblock Gaming company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company nor Interblock Gaming company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Interblock Gaming company nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Interblock Gaming company nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Interblock Gaming company employs more people globally than Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise company, reflecting its scale as a Gambling Facilities and Casinos.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Interblock Gaming nor Seminole Nation Gaming Enterprise holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H