Comparison Overview

Intellicess Inc.

VS

ConocoPhillips

Intellicess Inc.

7000 N Mo Pac Expy Austin, Texas 78731, US
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Intellicess is an Austin based technology startup that develops and deploys edge and cloud analytics engines

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ConocoPhillips

925 N Eldridge Pkwy, Houston, Texas, 77079, US
Last Update: 2025-05-06 (UTC)

We are a global oil and gas company tasked with an important jobโ€”to safely find and deliver energy for the world. Weโ€™re experts in what we doโ€”from the well site to the office. Across our operations and activities in 13 countries, we never forget our responsibility to be a great neighbor, and a great place to work. Guided by our SPIRIT Valuesโ€”Safety, People, Integrity, Responsibility, Innovation and Teamworkโ€”we deliver strong performance, keeping our promises to our stakeholders, communities and each other. We solve problems and develop new approaches together, as a team of peopleโ€”not job titles. Thatโ€™s ConocoPhillips. Itโ€™s not just what we do. Itโ€™s how we do it. At ConocoPhillips, we believe it is important to foster a safe and constructive online environment for our community. To do so, we encourage visitors to contribute to conversations by following a few guidelines: - Please contribute to the dialogue by keeping your comments relevant to the community and on topic. - Direct your comments at issues, rather than individuals. Any of the following violations of these guidelines may warrant, without prior notice, actions such as removing posts and comments or blocking an account: - Comments that are spam, defamatory or offensive (e.g., obscene, indecent, profane, violent, cruel or discriminatory) will be removed. - Content that violates the terms of use stipulated by each social media operating company. - Any other behavior ConocoPhillips deems inappropriate. Community policy: https://bit.ly/3mrTG4d

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 16,610
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellicess-inc.jpeg
Intellicess Inc.
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conocophillips.jpeg
ConocoPhillips
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Intellicess Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ConocoPhillips
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intellicess Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ConocoPhillips in 2025.

Incident History โ€” Intellicess Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intellicess Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ConocoPhillips (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ConocoPhillips cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellicess-inc.jpeg
Intellicess Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/conocophillips.jpeg
ConocoPhillips
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Intellicess Inc. company and ConocoPhillips company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ConocoPhillips company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intellicess Inc. company.

In the current year, ConocoPhillips company and Intellicess Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ConocoPhillips company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ConocoPhillips company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ConocoPhillips company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intellicess Inc. company nor ConocoPhillips company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intellicess Inc. company nor ConocoPhillips company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ConocoPhillips company employs more people globally than Intellicess Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Allstar is a GitHub App to set and enforce security policies. In versions prior to 4.5, a vulnerability in Allstarโ€™s Reviewbot component caused inbound webhook requests to be validated against a hard-coded, shared secret. The value used for the secret token was compiled into the Allstar binary and could not be configured at runtime. In practice, this meant that every deployment using Reviewbot would validate requests with the same secret unless the operator modified source code and rebuilt the component - an expectation that is not documented and is easy to miss. All Allstar releases prior to v4.5 that include the Reviewbot code path are affected. Deployments on v4.5 and later are not affected. Those who have not enabled or exposed the Reviewbot endpoint are not exposed to this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities with Calendar events in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a userโ€™s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name or (3) Last Name text field.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. In versions prior to 5.6.0, upon authentication, the user could be associated by e-mail even if the `associate_by_email` pipeline was not included. This could lead to account compromise when a third-party authentication service does not validate provided e-mail addresses or doesn't require unique e-mail addresses. Version 5.6.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, review the authentication service policy on e-mail addresses; many will not allow exploiting this vulnerability.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X