Comparison Overview

Intellicess Inc.

VS

ALUSA

Intellicess Inc.

7000 N Mo Pac Expy Austin, Texas 78731, US
Last Update: 2025-03-17 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Intellicess is an Austin based technology startup that develops and deploys edge and cloud analytics engines

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 2-10
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ALUSA

None
Last Update: 2025-03-14 (UTC)

Strong

A Alusa Engenharia uma empresa de infraestrutura que está presente no mercado há 50 anos e atua como integradora de projetos, obras e serviços ligados ao setor elétrico, de telecomunicações, óleo e gás, ampliando gradativamente a participação em outros segmentos da engenharia e construção civil, com obras desenvolvidas no Brasil e no exterior, com mais de 10.000 km de Linhas de Transmissão de extra alta tensão construídas. A marca da empresa também aparece em projetos desenvolvidos em outros países. Em 2005, em parceria com a Cemig, a Alusa deu início à sua expansão com a construção de uma linha de transmissão de 200 km no Chile. No mesmo ano, a Alusa chegou à Argentina com a Siemens, implantando mais de 140 km de linhas de transmissão de energia. O mais novo projeto foi na Costa Rica onde a Alusa desenvolveu sozinha uma linha de 50 km, energizada no final de 2009 em conjunto com 3 subestações. A Alusa possui hoje mais de 6000 empregados, 17 Sistemas de Transmissão com 4950 km de linhas de transmissão (Concessão), mais de 100 subestações construídas (10.000 MVA), 10 milhões de homens/hora aplicados em manutenção e construção de redes de distribuição, 4 Geradoras de energia em construção (179 MW de capacidade instalada), possui o maior Centro de Treinamento Privado no Brasil com 8.000 m2 como 128.000 h/h treinados, além de mais de 60.000 km de Linhas de Distribuição implementados, fato que faz da Alusa uma das maiores empresas de projetos neste segmento.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 10,001+
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellicess-inc.jpeg
Intellicess Inc.
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alusa.jpeg
ALUSA
ISO 27001
Not verified
SOC 2
Not verified
GDPR
No public badge
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Intellicess Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ALUSA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intellicess Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ALUSA in 2025.

Incident History — Intellicess Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intellicess Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ALUSA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ALUSA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellicess-inc.jpeg
Intellicess Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/alusa.jpeg
ALUSA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Intellicess Inc. company and ALUSA company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ALUSA company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intellicess Inc. company.

In the current year, ALUSA company and Intellicess Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ALUSA company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ALUSA company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ALUSA company nor Intellicess Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intellicess Inc. company nor ALUSA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intellicess Inc. company nor ALUSA company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Neither Intellicess Inc. company nor ALUSA company has publicly disclosed the exact number of their employees.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Better Auth is an authentication and authorization library for TypeScript. In versions prior to 1.3.26, unauthenticated attackers can create or modify API keys for any user by passing that user's id in the request body to the `api/auth/api-key/create` route. `session?.user ?? (authRequired ? null : { id: ctx.body.userId })`. When no session exists but `userId` is present in the request body, `authRequired` becomes false and the user object is set to the attacker-controlled ID. Server-only field validation only executes when `authRequired` is true (lines 280-295), allowing attackers to set privileged fields. No additional authentication occurs before the database operation, so the malicious payload is accepted. The same pattern exists in the update endpoint. This is a critical authentication bypass enabling full an unauthenticated attacker can generate an API key for any user and immediately gain complete authenticated access. This allows the attacker to perform any action as the victim user using the api key, potentially compromise the user data and the application depending on the victim's privileges. Version 1.3.26 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Allstar is a GitHub App to set and enforce security policies. In versions prior to 4.5, a vulnerability in Allstar’s Reviewbot component caused inbound webhook requests to be validated against a hard-coded, shared secret. The value used for the secret token was compiled into the Allstar binary and could not be configured at runtime. In practice, this meant that every deployment using Reviewbot would validate requests with the same secret unless the operator modified source code and rebuilt the component - an expectation that is not documented and is easy to miss. All Allstar releases prior to v4.5 that include the Reviewbot code path are affected. Deployments on v4.5 and later are not affected. Those who have not enabled or exposed the Reviewbot endpoint are not exposed to this issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities with Calendar events in Liferay Portal 7.4.3.35 through 7.4.3.111, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.7, 7.4 update 35 through update 92, and 7.3 update 25 through update 36 allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a user’s (1) First Name, (2) Middle Name or (3) Last Name text field.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. In versions prior to 5.6.0, upon authentication, the user could be associated by e-mail even if the `associate_by_email` pipeline was not included. This could lead to account compromise when a third-party authentication service does not validate provided e-mail addresses or doesn't require unique e-mail addresses. Version 5.6.0 contains a patch. As a workaround, review the authentication service policy on e-mail addresses; many will not allow exploiting this vulnerability.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Confidential Containers's Trustee project contains tools and components for attesting confidential guests and providing secrets to them. In versions prior to 0.15.0, the attestation-policy endpoint didn't check if the kbs-client submitting the request was actually authenticated (had the right key). This allowed any kbs-client to actually change the attestation policy. Version 0.15.0 fixes the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X