Comparison Overview

IntellectuLaw

VS

The Francis Company

IntellectuLaw

Mount Sinai, Long Island, New York, 11766, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 700 and 749

Innovative businesses usually have more Intellectual Property (IP) than they realize. Most are also unsure of which IP they need to protect, and the best way to do that. And, they often aren’t seeing opportunities to get their IP earning additional revenue. ★ WHAT WE DO: Here at INTELLECTULAW™, we help innovative businesses to discover the full extent of their IP, protect it appropriately (without wasting resources) and maximize the financial return on their IP. We are highly strategic, proactive and commercially focused. For over 25 years, our unique approach has delighted our clients by helping them in each of these areas - across the USA and internationally. This enables them to have what they want from their business and in their lives. We also advise and protect our clients more widely in commercial law and business matters, acting as “family office” advisors. ★ WHAT MAKES US DIFFERENT: Our clients are delighted in our approach, which provides them with: Far greater and more transparent advice, starting with our no-fee initial consultation and firm fee estimates (which is virtually unheard of among law firms) Deep experience: a hands-on commercial background in the scientific, engineering, pharmaceutical and food industries, giving us direct experience and insights A far more proactive and strategic service that focuses squarely on them and what they really want from their business and their life In short, we are ardent advocates for our clients, and we treat them literally like family. Our services include: ► Trademark Law ► Patent Law ► Copyright Law ► Intellectual Property Law litigation ► Business Law ► IT Law ► Corporate Law ► Entertainment Law ★ READY TO TALK? To discuss protecting your trademark, patent, copyright or other IP, email me at [email protected].

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 2
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Francis Company

31 West 16th Street, New York, NY, 10011, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

The Francis Company is an intellectual property advisory company. Founded on deep in-house IP expertise, our lawyers provide a comprehensive set of domestic and global, industry-leading IP business and legal strategy and management services. Among our clients are US, foreign, and multi-national companies, start-ups, entrepreneurs, estates, and law firm IP practices. The Francis Company enables you to cost effectively bridge the gap between simply developing and managing your IP and using it to gain a tangible, sustainable business advantage and increase the value of your IP. Working with The Francis Company accelerates your IP agenda in a manner that can't be achieved alone. We also help you synchronize your IP strategy, protection, and monetization with appropriate staffing and operational resources and workflows. We advance your business objectives to secure a competitive edge, resulting in the highest return on IP investment for the long term. And, you will get more done in less time for less money.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellectulaw.jpeg
IntellectuLaw
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-francis-company.jpeg
The Francis Company
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IntellectuLaw
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Francis Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IntellectuLaw in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Francis Company in 2025.

Incident History — IntellectuLaw (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IntellectuLaw cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Francis Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Francis Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intellectulaw.jpeg
IntellectuLaw
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-francis-company.jpeg
The Francis Company
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Francis Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IntellectuLaw company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Francis Company company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IntellectuLaw company.

In the current year, The Francis Company company and IntellectuLaw company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Francis Company company nor IntellectuLaw company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Francis Company company nor IntellectuLaw company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Francis Company company nor IntellectuLaw company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IntellectuLaw company nor The Francis Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IntellectuLaw company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to The Francis Company company.

The Francis Company company employs more people globally than IntellectuLaw company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IntellectuLaw nor The Francis Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X