Comparison Overview

Integrity Print

VS

MCA – NetPub, Inc

Integrity Print

Westfield Trading Estate, Bath, BA3 4BS, GB
Last Update: 2025-12-11

Integrity Print is a leading provider of operational business print requirements, encompassing the production of: • Base Stationery • Integrated Cards • Integrated Labels • Security Print • Digital Colour Printing • Direct Mail Printing • Direct Mail Personalisation • Operational Print • Inserts • Flyers • Door Drops • Critical NHS Supplies • Pressure Seal Forms • Paper Wraps • Labels and Packaging The company continues to deliver exceptionally sound financial performances in challenging market sector. In recent years strong sales growth has been achieved without sacrificing profitability. Top line sales growth allied with sound financial management has enabled the business to invest in both technology and people. The business performance has been underpinned by a stable, skilled and well motivated workforce led with passion and vision by a management team that is committed to building a World Class printing business with a long term future.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 79
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

MCA – NetPub, Inc

675 Dutchess Turnpike, Poughkeepsie, NY, 12601, US
Last Update: 2025-12-10
Between 750 and 799

MCA – NetPub, Inc, Incorporated is an award-winning on-demand printing, publishing, storage and fulfillment company with over 25 years of experience in the book and manual printing business. We are an independently owned facility, headquartered in Poughkeepsie, New York. MCA – NetPub, Inc Track Record: -Book Business Magazine named NetPublications, Inc one of the Top 20 Leading Digital Book Printers. -Article on NetPublications, Inc. - Digital book publisher thrives in Hudson Valley (PDF), Hudson Valley Business Journal, 2009 -Recipient of the Print on Demand Innovation Leadership Award -NetPublications'​ president awarded the Print On Demand Pioneer Award -Ranked 2nd for Total Paid Impressions in Print on Demand Magazine, and ranked as a Print On Demand Top Site for the fifth time in as many years. -Developed patented, award-winning Print-On-Demand solution: Printway.com -One of only three vendors to beta-test the latest Print On Demand technology. -Alliances with major technology providers. -Over One Billion impressions printed. -Publishing partners include major publishing organizations and multi-national service organizations.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition: Printing and Related Support Activities
Employees: 9
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print.jpeg
Integrity Print
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netpublications-inc.jpeg
MCA – NetPub, Inc
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Integrity Print
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
MCA – NetPub, Inc
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrity Print in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for MCA – NetPub, Inc in 2025.

Incident History — Integrity Print (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrity Print cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — MCA – NetPub, Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

MCA – NetPub, Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrity-print.jpeg
Integrity Print
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/netpublications-inc.jpeg
MCA – NetPub, Inc
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

MCA – NetPub, Inc company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Integrity Print company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, MCA – NetPub, Inc company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Integrity Print company.

In the current year, MCA – NetPub, Inc company and Integrity Print company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor Integrity Print company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor Integrity Print company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither MCA – NetPub, Inc company nor Integrity Print company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Integrity Print company nor MCA – NetPub, Inc company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Integrity Print company nor MCA – NetPub, Inc company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Integrity Print company employs more people globally than MCA – NetPub, Inc company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Integrity Print nor MCA – NetPub, Inc holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N