Comparison Overview

IntegriPrint, Inc.

VS

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa

IntegriPrint, Inc.

309 12th Ave S, Buffalo, Minnesota, 55313, US
Last Update: 2025-12-12
Between 750 and 799

Our goal is to make our clients look great! There are four things that IntegriPrint will do: 1. Respond quickly 2. Understand the purpose of the project, not just the print specs 3. Handle every project with the human touch 4. Learn new technologies and bring new solutions to clients What does this mean to you? It means we are going to take the time to understand your goals and objectives so we can offer solutions to help improve your chances of meeting those goals. There will be human hands and eyes taking care of your job as an individual project to assure color consistency and preserve your professional image. We believe in building relationships, understanding individual’s business needs, proposing solutions to match those needs, following up to measure results and proposing changes as appropriate. We understand the need to maximize your budget. We’ll partner with you to build systems and strategies with that goal in mind. Everyone here at IntegriPrint has your best interest at heart and will strive to help you succeed. We know our success depends on the success of our clients.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 5
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa

3616 West Cypress Street, Tampa, Florida 33607, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Pip Printing and Marketing Services has been serving the greater Tampa Bay area since 1986. This facility is family owned and operated and is a certified minority/woman owned business. Over the past 23 years our center has evolved from a printing and copying facility to a full service commercial print house offering print based marketing solutions. What makes us unique? PIP Printing is not your traditional printer. We help address all of your document, business, and marketing objectives with print based marketing solutions that meet your ever changing business needs. We can take your ideas from creation to print and provide you with visually appealing results that allow you to make a big impression. We understand the changing business marketplace and have the resources to address your marketing objectives with a wide variety of services. From traditional offset printing to multimedia marketing tools, PIP can do it all! We are in business to help you grow your business!

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integriprint-inc..jpeg
IntegriPrint, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pip-printing-and-marketing-services-tampa.jpeg
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
IntegriPrint, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for IntegriPrint, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa in 2025.

Incident History — IntegriPrint, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IntegriPrint, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integriprint-inc..jpeg
IntegriPrint, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pip-printing-and-marketing-services-tampa.jpeg
PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IntegriPrint, Inc. company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to IntegriPrint, Inc. company.

In the current year, PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company and IntegriPrint, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company nor IntegriPrint, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company nor IntegriPrint, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company nor IntegriPrint, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. company nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. company nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

IntegriPrint, Inc. company employs more people globally than PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds HIPAA certification.

Neither IntegriPrint, Inc. nor PIP - Marketing, Signs, Print -Tampa holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L