Comparison Overview

Integrated Benefits Inc.

VS

CFG

Integrated Benefits Inc.

203 Alameda Dr., Jefferson City, MO, 65102, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

IBI was founded in 1986 and provides nationwide service to process disability claims at any level within the Social Security Administration. We are proud to be among the highest volume, most experienced Social Security disability service firms in the country. Attorney Representatives: Unlike our major competitors, IBI employs experienced Attorney Representatives at the hearing level to ensure that all IBI claims receive high quality representation. IBI attorneys exclusively practice disability law, and we are proud to be industry leaders in the SSDI realm. Professional Service: We are proud of more than our remarkable award statistics. We are most proud of our the fundamental values by which our company is operated. Our work achieves a standard of excellence that has earned us a reputation for precision, reliability and unsurpassed professionalism. Our high level of customer service is unmatched. Faster, More Complete Awards: IBI strives for fast and complete awards for every claim referred to us. After 35+ years in business and support to the long-term disability (LTD) industry, our mission is to redefine industry standards for both service and savings. IBI effectively integrates LTD and Social Security, and we can assist carriers in all aspects of Social Security entitlement. The result? Bottom-line savings to you.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CFG

4 Oakwater Avenue, Cheadle, SK8 3SR, GB
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

We empower people to rebuild their lives after injury, offering highly specialised legal services in serious injury, medical negligence and Court of Protection. But our experience covers so much more than law. We also have clinically trained colleagues who can help you with our full wraparound support, ensuring you can achieve your best possible outcome. Learn more about us at: https://www.cfglaw.co.uk/ https://www.facebook.com/cfglaw https://twitter.com/CfgLaw

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 165
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrated-benefits-inc-.jpeg
Integrated Benefits Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfg-law.jpeg
CFG
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Integrated Benefits Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CFG
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integrated Benefits Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CFG in 2025.

Incident History — Integrated Benefits Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integrated Benefits Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CFG (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CFG cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integrated-benefits-inc-.jpeg
Integrated Benefits Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cfg-law.jpeg
CFG
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Integrated Benefits Inc. company and CFG company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, CFG company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Integrated Benefits Inc. company.

In the current year, CFG company and Integrated Benefits Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CFG company nor Integrated Benefits Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CFG company nor Integrated Benefits Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CFG company nor Integrated Benefits Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. company nor CFG company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. company nor CFG company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CFG company employs more people globally than Integrated Benefits Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Integrated Benefits Inc. nor CFG holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X