Comparison Overview

Integra Health

VS

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)

Integra Health

130 King Street West, Suite 1320, Toronto, ON, CA, M5X1C8
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Integra Health Centre is a BIPOC, female-owned organization founded in 2015 with a mission and vision to change the way healthcare is delivered. We are a leading healthcare services company delivering integrated medical, rehabilitation, mental health, and wellness solutions to individuals, corporate clients, and government agencies. Our 2 clinics are located in the Financial District PATH in Downtown Toronto, where we offer both in-person and virtual care to meet the diverse and evolving needs of our patients. Beyond our clinics, Integra Health provides comprehensive corporate wellness programs and national government staffing solutions — ensuring health and well-being are prioritized in workplaces, communities, and remote regions across Canada.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 53
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)

None
Last Update: 2025-11-26
Between 800 and 849

PPN is one of the first Preferred Provider organisations of any discipline to enter the medical aid market. Our founding principles of integrity, transparency and trust remain the backbone of our business principle. We partner with Medical Schemes for Optical Benefit Management Services. PPN provides a highly sophisticated, market leading, claims administration process, which includes an innovative optical benefit design and fraud controls to contain both scheme exposure and member co-payment exposure. In conjunction with honesty and trust, the PPN team in our daily activities are fully committed to the company values: • Caring, • Accountability, • Excellence, • Respect • Integrity The key focus for PPN is to ensure that our medical aid members receive an exceptional service experience and that our fraud interventions result in eradicating most of the FWA. PPN employs new talent and invests in systems continuously to stay on the forefront of new technology.

NAICS: 923
NAICS Definition: Administration of Human Resource Programs
Employees: 106
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integra-health-centre.jpeg
Integra Health
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ppn.jpeg
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Integra Health
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integra Health in 2025.

Incidents vs Health and Human Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) in 2025.

Incident History — Integra Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integra Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integra-health-centre.jpeg
Integra Health
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ppn.jpeg
PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Integra Health company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Integra Health company.

In the current year, PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company and Integra Health company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company nor Integra Health company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company nor Integra Health company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company nor Integra Health company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Integra Health company nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Integra Health company nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) company employs more people globally than Integra Health company, reflecting its scale as a Health and Human Services.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Integra Health nor PPN (Preferred Provider Negotiators) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H