Comparison Overview

Integ

VS

L+L Printers

Integ

700 W Loop 340, Waco, Texas, 76712, US
Last Update: 2025-12-17
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.integdoes.com

We are a client-driven company that handles the project needs of our customers, step-by-step from concept to execution, with sharp attention to their specific wishes, requirements, and vision. Integ is a solution provider for services including digital printing, offset printing, mailing and fulfillment, creative services, promotional products, signage and online portals. Every service we provide, from creative to mailing and everything in between, is integrated into each other so we can go one step at a time to be able to present you with exactly what you need. Integrity and Integration are what make Integ. Integ Does content delivery in a variety of ways to help tell your story. You have a story to tell...Integ Delivers.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 64
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

L+L Printers

6200 Yarrow Drive, Carlsbad, CA, 92011, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799
http://llprinters.com

We are the leading print service provider in Southern California. Our facility is located in Carlsbad, California. We specialize in offset & digital printing, mailing services, and large format printing. We also offer print-on-demand, variable data printing, stochastic screening, online storefronts, fulfillment, PURL campaigns, QR codes, full bindery, full prepress, vehicle wraps, and the list goes on. To expand on our large format services, we offer an array of materials for almost any project from trade shows, conventions to wayfinding informational signs to event signage. We can also custom cut & route most materials to any shape. Whether it is vinyl & mesh banners, indoor & outdoor wall murals, backdrop & retractable banners, building graphics, backlit signs, acrylic, coroplast, foam core, ACM/DiBond, vehicle wraps, window & floor graphics, retail & event graphics, POP graphics, trade show signage or pop up displays. Our wide range of substrates and equipment allows us to provide endless possibilities to create a fully custom piece. L+L Printers is also very dedicated to the environment. We recycle over 60 tons of paper per month, all press plates, and all unused ink. We print with soy-based Inks. We are FSC Certified and we also offset all energy in our production facility and offices by investing 100% in Wind Energy Renewable Energy Credits (RECs). And L+L is the founder and sponsor of iLuvTrees.org, a sustainability initiative.

NAICS: 323
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 47
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integdoes.jpeg
Integ
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l-l-printers.jpeg
L+L Printers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Integ
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
L+L Printers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Integ in 2025.

Incidents vs Printing Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for L+L Printers in 2025.

Incident History — Integ (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Integ cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — L+L Printers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

L+L Printers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/integdoes.jpeg
Integ
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/l-l-printers.jpeg
L+L Printers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Integ company and L+L Printers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, L+L Printers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Integ company.

In the current year, L+L Printers company and Integ company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither L+L Printers company nor Integ company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither L+L Printers company nor Integ company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither L+L Printers company nor Integ company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Integ company nor L+L Printers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Integ company nor L+L Printers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Integ company employs more people globally than L+L Printers company, reflecting its scale as a Printing Services.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Integ nor L+L Printers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Nagios XI versions prior to 2026R1.1 are vulnerable to local privilege escalation due to an unsafe interaction between sudo permissions and application file permissions. A user‑accessible maintenance script may be executed as root via sudo and includes an application file that is writable by a lower‑privileged user. A local attacker with access to the application account can modify this file to introduce malicious code, which is then executed with elevated privileges when the script is run. Successful exploitation results in arbitrary code execution as the root user.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Out of bounds read and write in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

Use after free in WebGPU in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.147 allowed a remote attacker to potentially exploit heap corruption via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
References
Description

SIPGO is a library for writing SIP services in the GO language. Starting in version 0.3.0 and prior to version 1.0.0-alpha-1, a nil pointer dereference vulnerability is in the SIPGO library's `NewResponseFromRequest` function that affects all normal SIP operations. The vulnerability allows remote attackers to crash any SIP application by sending a single malformed SIP request without a To header. The vulnerability occurs when SIP message parsing succeeds for a request missing the To header, but the response creation code assumes the To header exists without proper nil checks. This affects routine operations like call setup, authentication, and message handling - not just error cases. This vulnerability affects all SIP applications using the sipgo library, not just specific configurations or edge cases, as long as they make use of the `NewResponseFromRequest` function. Version 1.0.0-alpha-1 contains a patch for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

GLPI is a free asset and IT management software package. Starting in version 9.1.0 and prior to version 10.0.21, an unauthorized user with an API access can read all knowledge base entries. Users should upgrade to 10.0.21 to receive a patch.

Published
Date
2025-12-16
Updated
Date
2025-12-16
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
References