Comparison Overview

Intake Desk

VS

CourtSolutions

Intake Desk

4611 Johnson Rd, Coconut Creek, Florida, 33073, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28
Between 750 and 799

Intake Desk provides immediate and high value results to the nation’s top law firms by delivering new clients that have been injured by the manufacturers of dangerous drugs and medical devices. We provide in-house advertising paired with best-in-class intake retention services that utilizes your firm’s case criteria to retain qualified claimants on your behalf. Strict processes including in-house paralegal case review allows us to consistently deliver the highest quality intake retention results possible which maximizes your law firm’s advertising budget.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

CourtSolutions

641 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10022, US
Last Update: 2025-11-27

CourtSolutions is a revolutionary new way for judges, lawyers and other court participants to appear telephonically in Court. Judges have powerful options to manage their telephonic courtrooms through an easy-to-use visual interface. Participants also can access the visual interface to see who is on the line, who is speaking and a host of other innovative controls. At every step of the process, CourtSolutions reduces the administrative burden for starting and managing telephonic appearances for Judges, chambers, lawyers and other participants. During the hearing, the Judge and each Participant can access the CourtSolutions’ Hearing Dashboard—a visual representation of everyone registered for the call and their status. Know instantly exactly who is speaking, who they represent and who wants to speak—all the visual cues that are lost through other conference calling solutions.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 1
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intakedesk.jpeg
Intake Desk
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/courtsolutions.jpeg
CourtSolutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intake Desk
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CourtSolutions
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intake Desk in 2025.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CourtSolutions in 2025.

Incident History — Intake Desk (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intake Desk cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CourtSolutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CourtSolutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intakedesk.jpeg
Intake Desk
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/courtsolutions.jpeg
CourtSolutions
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CourtSolutions company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intake Desk company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, CourtSolutions company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intake Desk company.

In the current year, CourtSolutions company and Intake Desk company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CourtSolutions company nor Intake Desk company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CourtSolutions company nor Intake Desk company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CourtSolutions company nor Intake Desk company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intake Desk company nor CourtSolutions company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Intake Desk company nor CourtSolutions company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Intake Desk company employs more people globally than CourtSolutions company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intake Desk nor CourtSolutions holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was determined in motogadget mo.lock Ignition Lock up to 20251125. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component NFC Handler. Executing manipulation can lead to use of hard-coded cryptographic key . The physical device can be targeted for the attack. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. The exploitation appears to be difficult. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 1.2
Severity: HIGH
AV:L/AC:H/Au:N/C:P/I:N/A:N
cvss3
Base: 2.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:P/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
cvss4
Base: 1.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:P/AC:H/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the interview attachment retrieval endpoint in the Recruitment module serves files based solely on an authenticated session and user-supplied identifiers, without verifying whether the requester has permission to access the associated interview record. Because the server does not perform any recruitment-level authorization checks, an ESS-level user with no access to recruitment workflows can directly request interview attachment URLs and receive the corresponding files. This exposes confidential interview documents—including candidate CVs, evaluations, and supporting files—to unauthorized users. The issue arises from relying on predictable object identifiers and session presence rather than validating the user’s association with the relevant recruitment process. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application’s recruitment attachment retrieval endpoint does not enforce the required authorization checks before serving candidate files. Even users restricted to ESS-level access, who have no permission to view the Recruitment module, can directly access candidate attachment URLs. When an authenticated request is made to the attachment endpoint, the system validates the session but does not confirm that the requesting user has the necessary recruitment permissions. As a result, any authenticated user can download CVs and other uploaded documents for arbitrary candidates by issuing direct requests to the attachment endpoint, leading to unauthorized exposure of sensitive applicant data. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the application does not invalidate existing sessions when a user is disabled or when a password change occurs, allowing active session cookies to remain valid indefinitely. As a result, a disabled user, or an attacker using a compromised account, can continue to access protected pages and perform operations as long as a prior session remains active. Because the server performs no session revocation or session-store cleanup during these critical state changes, disabling an account or updating credentials has no effect on already-established sessions. This makes administrative disable actions ineffective and allows unauthorized users to retain full access even after an account is closed or a password is reset, exposing the system to prolonged unauthorized use and significantly increasing the impact of account takeover scenarios. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

OrangeHRM is a comprehensive human resource management (HRM) system. From version 5.0 to 5.7, the password reset workflow does not enforce that the username submitted in the final reset request matches the account for which the reset process was originally initiated. After obtaining a valid reset link for any account they can receive email for, an attacker can alter the username parameter in the final reset request to target a different user. Because the system accepts the supplied username without verification, the attacker can set a new password for any chosen account, including privileged accounts, resulting in full account takeover. This issue has been patched in version 5.8.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X