Comparison Overview

Intact

VS

Brown & Brown

Intact

700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, CA, M5G 0A1
Last Update: 2025-12-09

We created a purpose-driven company based on Values and a belief that insurance is about people, not things. This is the foundation on which we have built Intact and it lives every day through our purpose, Values, what we aim to achieve and how. ___ Nous sommes là pour aider les gens, les entreprises et la société à aller de l’avant dans les bons moments et à être résilients dans le moments difficiles. Notre entreprise est basée sur des valeurs et la conviction que l’assurance doit d’abord s’intéresser aux personnes, et non aux choses. C’est dans cette optique que nous avons bâti Intact et ça se reflète chaque jour dans notre raison d’être, nos valeurs, nos facteurs de succès en leadership, notre promesse aux employés, nos objectifs et notre stratégie.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 20,361
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Brown & Brown

300 N Beach St, None, Daytona Beach, Florida, US, 32114
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Brown & Brown delivers risk management solutions to help protect and preserve what our customers value most. Our two business segments, Retail and Specialty Distribution, offer businesses and individuals a wide range of insurance solutions. We are one of the insurance industry’s most powerful and influential leaders, with a strong, deeply rooted cultural foundation built on integrity, innovation, superior capabilities and discipline. The Power of WE ignites our performance, and while diverse and varied in abilities and experience, we are all connected through our core values, a commitment to our local communities and a shared mission—always doing what is best for our customers. Brown & Brown is proud to be certified as a Great Place to Work®, and we are always actively looking for talented teammates who embrace our culture to join our winning team. Find us on the NYSE as BRO.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition: Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees: 10,637
Subsidiaries: 19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-brown.jpeg
Brown & Brown
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Intact
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Brown & Brown
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Intact in 2025.

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Brown & Brown in 2025.

Incident History — Intact (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Intact cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Brown & Brown (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Brown & Brown cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/intact.jpeg
Intact
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/brown-brown.jpeg
Brown & Brown
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Brown & Brown company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Intact company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Brown & Brown company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Intact company.

In the current year, Brown & Brown company and Intact company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Brown & Brown company nor Intact company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Brown & Brown company nor Intact company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Brown & Brown company nor Intact company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Intact company nor Brown & Brown company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Brown & Brown company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Intact company.

Intact company employs more people globally than Brown & Brown company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Intact nor Brown & Brown holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N