Comparison Overview

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD

VS

Hanway Insurance Agency

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD

503, Abhijeet-1, Nr. Mithakhali Six Roads, Ellisbridge, Ahmedabad, Gujarat, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING is a Direct Broking Company licensed by Appropriate Authority under Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority of India (Insurance Brokers) Regulations, 2002. The Company with its Registered Office at Ahmedabad, commenced its operations as a Direct Insurance Broker in the year 2003. We started our activities with a clear objective of setting a tradition of true dedication to the cause of service to insuring public by rendering value added, professionally competent and technical services.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 19
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Hanway Insurance Agency

5153-1 South Pulaski Road, Chicago, IL, 60632, US
Last Update: 2026-01-01

Since 2011, Hanway Insurance has been offering comprehensive coverage beyond the standard options to clients across Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin. At Hanway Insurance, we understand that everyone's insurance needs are unique. That's why we specialize in non-standard auto insurance, catering to drivers for whom obtaining coverage elsewhere has been challenging. For those who have encountered difficulties such as SR-22 requirements, DUIs, numerous traffic violations, or other infractions, we're here to help. But our commitment to personalized insurance solutions doesn't stop there. In addition to non-standard auto insurance, we provide a range of other insurance options, including homeowners, renters, ride-sharing, and motorcycle coverage. No matter what your insurance needs are, we're dedicated to finding the right solution for our clients. Our mission is to provide peace of mind and financial security to every client, regardless of their past driving history. As we look to the future, we remain steadfast in our dedication to providing personalized insurance solutions that truly make a difference in our clients' lives.

NAICS: 524
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insutech-insurance-broking-services-pvt-ltd.jpeg
INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanway-insurance-agency-llc-.jpeg
Hanway Insurance Agency
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Hanway Insurance Agency
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Hanway Insurance Agency in 2026.

Incident History — INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Hanway Insurance Agency (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Hanway Insurance Agency cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insutech-insurance-broking-services-pvt-ltd.jpeg
INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/hanway-insurance-agency-llc-.jpeg
Hanway Insurance Agency
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Hanway Insurance Agency company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Hanway Insurance Agency company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company.

In the current year, Hanway Insurance Agency company and INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Hanway Insurance Agency company nor INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Hanway Insurance Agency company nor INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Hanway Insurance Agency company nor INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company nor Hanway Insurance Agency company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company nor Hanway Insurance Agency company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD company employs more people globally than Hanway Insurance Agency company, reflecting its scale as a Insurance Agencies and Brokerages.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INSUTECH INSURANCE BROKING SERVICES PVT LTD nor Hanway Insurance Agency holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N