Comparison Overview

Insurance Planning Solutions

VS

The Council's International Working Group

Insurance Planning Solutions

138 Misty Valley Drive, Canton, GA 30114, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Insurance Planning Solutions is a company dedicated to helping our clients find and utilize the best insurance benefits available to them. We recognize that insurance is not a "one size fits all" industry. We shop from many reputable companies to find the right coverage and cost for our clients. We compare individual and group benefits and help our clients understand the differences in coverage and underwriting in order to find the right plan for them. After they have their insurance, we help with any issues or questions they have. We work with clients when it is convenient for them. Our mission statement: We believe that providing QUALITY SERVICE to our clients is our highest priority. We believe each individual, family, employer, and group has their own unique requirements and our job is to find the product, price, and quality program that best fit those unique requirements. We believe that HONESTY, INTEGRITY, and PROFESSIONALISM are the foundation for our relationship with our clients.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

The Council's International Working Group

None
Last Update: 2026-01-01

The International Working Group (IWG) is a dynamic forum for Council member firms engaged in global insurance placements or seeking to expand their international capabilities. Open to all members with global interests, the IWG fosters peer-to-peer exchange, strategic collaboration, and industry leadership among brokers navigating the complexities of international markets. Our mission is to provide an open, interactive space for member firms to explore emerging trends, operational challenges, and business opportunities in global insurance. Through informal discussions, roundtables, and collaborative learning, the IWG connects professionals from the most innovative and entrepreneurial brokerages to build relationships, share insights, and launch new partnerships with sector leaders across major global markets. Participants benefit from exclusive access to real-time market intelligence and a trusted community of international peers. The group regularly explores a range of critical cross-border issues including regulatory developments, taxation, cybersecurity, international HR and recruitment, placement strategies, IT system integration, and data privacy. The IWG serves as a think tank and sounding board for brokers focused on improving service delivery, managing risk, and navigating the intricacies of international operations. It’s a space where senior executives, operational leaders, and rising talent alike can gain new perspectives, benchmark practices, and shape the future of global brokerage operations. Whether you're a seasoned international player or just beginning to grow your global practice, the IWG offers the connections, content, and community to help you succeed in a fast-changing world. Join the conversation, strengthen your network, and help shape the future of international insurance placement.

NAICS: 52421
NAICS Definition: Insurance Agencies and Brokerages
Employees: None
Subsidiaries: 8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insurance-planning-solutions.jpeg
Insurance Planning Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-council-s-international-working-group.jpeg
The Council's International Working Group
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Insurance Planning Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
The Council's International Working Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Insurance Planning Solutions in 2026.

Incidents vs Insurance Agencies and Brokerages Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Council's International Working Group in 2026.

Incident History — Insurance Planning Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Insurance Planning Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — The Council's International Working Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Council's International Working Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/insurance-planning-solutions.jpeg
Insurance Planning Solutions
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-council-s-international-working-group.jpeg
The Council's International Working Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

The Council's International Working Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Insurance Planning Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, The Council's International Working Group company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Insurance Planning Solutions company.

In the current year, The Council's International Working Group company and Insurance Planning Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither The Council's International Working Group company nor Insurance Planning Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither The Council's International Working Group company nor Insurance Planning Solutions company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither The Council's International Working Group company nor Insurance Planning Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions company nor The Council's International Working Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

The Council's International Working Group company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Insurance Planning Solutions company.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Insurance Planning Solutions nor The Council's International Working Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N