Comparison Overview

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au

VS

GenZ Publishing

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au

41 Bridge Rd, Glebe, NSW, 2037, AU
Last Update: 2025-11-28

INSTYLE is Australia’s leading hairdressing industry magazine and an authoritative source for news, reviews, interviews, profiles and inspiration for salon professionals online and in print. INSTYLE inspires the industry in two weekly newsletters and in print six times per year. In 2021, INSTYLE will deliver Hair Festival over the June long weekend, at Carriageworks, Sydney, offering the industry an opportunity to shop, learn, compete and connect over two important days.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 4
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

GenZ Publishing

None, None, Morganville, New Jersey, US, None
Last Update: 2025-11-27
Between 750 and 799

Our mission is to give talented new writers and members of the new generation a voice that is universally heard. The publishing field has changed a lot, and it is easy for innovative new writers to go undiscovered. We are here to change that. GenZ is the fastest growing publishing company of the year! We publish under 10% of those who query us to bring you amazing books by talented authors. We're a member of the Independent Book Publishers Association. Zenith Publishing is our YA/NA imprint.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 20
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instyle-&-styleicons-com-au.jpeg
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genz-publishing.jpeg
GenZ Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
GenZ Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for GenZ Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au (X = Date, Y = Severity)

INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — GenZ Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

GenZ Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/instyle-&-styleicons-com-au.jpeg
INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/genz-publishing.jpeg
GenZ Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

GenZ Publishing company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, GenZ Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company.

In the current year, GenZ Publishing company and INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither GenZ Publishing company nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither GenZ Publishing company nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither GenZ Publishing company nor INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company nor GenZ Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

GenZ Publishing company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company.

GenZ Publishing company employs more people globally than INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither INSTYLE & styleicons.com.au nor GenZ Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.