Comparison Overview

Institute for Security and Technology (IST)

VS

China Development Research Foundation

Institute for Security and Technology (IST)

San Francisco Bay Area , 94302, US
Last Update: 2025-12-01
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://securityandtechnology.org/

The Institute for Security and Technology (IST) is the 501(c)(3) critical action think tank that unites technology and policy leaders to create solutions to emerging security challenges. IST stands at the forefront of convening policymakers, technology experts, and industry leaders to identify and translate discourse into impact. We take collaborative action to advance national security and global stability through technology built on trust, guiding businesses and governments with hands-on expertise, in-depth analysis, and a global network. Since its foundation in 2020, IST has launched a vast array of impactful initiatives addressing challenges such as ransomware, the resilience of lifeline critical infrastructure, trust and safety, nuclear risk reduction, the role of artificial intelligence, and more.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

China Development Research Foundation

Floor 15, Tower A, Imperial International Center,, Beijing, undefined, 100011, CN
Last Update: 2025-12-01
Between 750 and 799
http://cdrf.org.cn/

The China Development Research Foundation is a non-profit institution that seeks to improve social and economic development in China through applied policy research, training, and informed dialogue. Initiated by the Development Research Centre of the State Council of the People’s Republic of China, the Foundation works on public policy issues in partnership with leading universities, financial institutions, private enterprises, and government agencies in China and internationally.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 68
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-security-technology.jpeg
Institute for Security and Technology (IST)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-research-foundation.jpeg
China Development Research Foundation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute for Security and Technology (IST)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
China Development Research Foundation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute for Security and Technology (IST) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Development Research Foundation in 2025.

Incident History — Institute for Security and Technology (IST) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute for Security and Technology (IST) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — China Development Research Foundation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Development Research Foundation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-security-technology.jpeg
Institute for Security and Technology (IST)
Incidents

Date Detected: 8/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-development-research-foundation.jpeg
China Development Research Foundation
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

China Development Research Foundation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China Development Research Foundation company has not reported any.

In the current year, China Development Research Foundation company and Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither China Development Research Foundation company nor Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither China Development Research Foundation company nor Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while China Development Research Foundation company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company nor China Development Research Foundation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company nor China Development Research Foundation company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Both Institute for Security and Technology (IST) company and China Development Research Foundation company employ a similar number of people globally.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute for Security and Technology (IST) nor China Development Research Foundation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

MCP Server Kubernetes is an MCP Server that can connect to a Kubernetes cluster and manage it. Prior to 2.9.8, there is a security issue exists in the exec_in_pod tool of the mcp-server-kubernetes MCP Server. The tool accepts user-provided commands in both array and string formats. When a string format is provided, it is passed directly to shell interpretation (sh -c) without input validation, allowing shell metacharacters to be interpreted. This vulnerability can be exploited through direct command injection or indirect prompt injection attacks, where AI agents may execute commands without explicit user intent. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.4
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

XML external entity (XXE) injection in eyoucms v1.7.1 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted body of a POST request.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

An issue was discovered in Fanvil x210 V2 2.12.20 allowing unauthenticated attackers on the local network to access administrative functions of the device (e.g. file upload, firmware update, reboot...) via a crafted authentication bypass.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
References
Description

Cal.com is open-source scheduling software. Prior to 5.9.8, A flaw in the login credentials provider allows an attacker to bypass password verification when a TOTP code is provided, potentially gaining unauthorized access to user accounts. This issue exists due to problematic conditional logic in the authentication flow. This vulnerability is fixed in 5.9.8.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Rhino is an open-source implementation of JavaScript written entirely in Java. Prior to 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1, when an application passed an attacker controlled float poing number into the toFixed() function, it might lead to high CPU consumption and a potential Denial of Service. Small numbers go through this call stack: NativeNumber.numTo > DToA.JS_dtostr > DToA.JS_dtoa > DToA.pow5mult where pow5mult attempts to raise 5 to a ridiculous power. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.8.1, 1.7.15.1, and 1.7.14.1.

Published
Date
2025-12-03
Updated
Date
2025-12-03
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References