Comparison Overview

Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania

VS

York Museums Trust

Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, 19104-3289, US
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799

ICA is a launchpad for contemporary art and ideas, and a place of possibility. We create transformative experiences with art across disciplines and encourage bold experimentation, deep connection, and boundless curiosity among artists and audiences alike. Founded in 1963 by the visionary dean of the School of Fine Arts at the University of Pennsylvania (today’s Weitzman School of Design), Holmes Perkins, our artist-centric program is complemented by the intellectual rigor of a premier academic institution. For more information about the Institute of Contemporary Art (ICA): www.icaphila.org

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 44
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

York Museums Trust

St Mary's Lodge, York, Yorkshire, YO30 7DR, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-23

York Museums Trust was formed on 1 August 2002 as an independent charitable trust to manage the museums and gallery service previously run by City of York Council. Supported by the Council, York Museums Trust is responsible for York Art Gallery, York Castle Museum, Yorkshire Museum and Gardens and York St Mary’s.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 128
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-contemporary-art-at-university-of-pennsylvania.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/york-museums-trust.jpeg
York Museums Trust
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
York Museums Trust
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for York Museums Trust in 2026.

Incident History — Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — York Museums Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)

York Museums Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/institute-of-contemporary-art-at-university-of-pennsylvania.jpeg
Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/york-museums-trust.jpeg
York Museums Trust
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company and York Museums Trust company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, York Museums Trust company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company.

In the current year, York Museums Trust company and Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither York Museums Trust company nor Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither York Museums Trust company nor Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither York Museums Trust company nor Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company nor York Museums Trust company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company nor York Museums Trust company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

York Museums Trust company employs more people globally than Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Institute of Contemporary Art at University of Pennsylvania nor York Museums Trust holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H